On 3/1/23 23:10, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 06:43:11PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 3/1/23 17:54, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the
>>> grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have
>>> Cirrus CI ch
ACK series, thanks for fixing this.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit
___
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 06:43:11PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 3/1/23 17:54, Eric Blake wrote:
> > I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the
> > grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have
> > Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms
On 3/1/23 18:43, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 3/1/23 17:54, Eric Blake wrote:
>> I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the
>> grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have
>> Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms.
>>
>> This series got me t
On 3/1/23 17:54, Eric Blake wrote:
> I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the
> grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have
> Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms.
>
> This series got me to a green checkmark:
> https://gitlab.com/e
I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the
grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have
Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms.
This series got me to a green checkmark:
https://gitlab.com/ebblake/nbdkit/-/pipelines/793156983
but depend
