On 25.07.2006 [10:28:06 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Valerie Henson wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > The Monday conf call is on. We'll be discussing what happened at
> > OLS and whether we should continue having conference calls, and if
> > so, in what form.
> >
>
> At the tim
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 10:09 -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 15:30 -0500, Steve Fox wrote:
> > This would be good to have as we encourage more people to use
> > libhugetlbfs who may not fully understand the test suite.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I am
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 15:30 -0500, Steve Fox wrote:
> This would be good to have as we encourage more people to use
> libhugetlbfs who may not fully understand the test suite.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am not sure that I agree with you completely here. I can see the
poin
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 15:43 -0500, Steve Fox wrote:
> The build process was sticking $DESTDIR/$HUGETLB_LDSCRIPT_PATH into the
> resultant /usr/bin/ld.hugetlbfs file rather than just
> $HUGETLB_LDSCRIPT_PATH. This patch fixes that.
Ooh good catch, applied.
--
Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com)
IBM L
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Valerie Henson wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> The Monday conf call is on. We'll be discussing what happened at OLS
> and whether we should continue having conference calls, and if so, in
> what form.
>
At the time of the call, I was somewhere over the atlantic wishing the
sugar-fi
