On 14.10.2006 [19:08:26 +1000], David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 04:27:42PM -0500, Steve Fox wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 09:26 -0500, Steve Fox wrote:
> >
> > > Instead of creating the shared mapping of size memsz (aligned), we're
> > > going to make it only filesz + non-zero BSS
On 14.10.2006 [12:45:49 +1000], David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 05:14:00PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 13.10.2006 [12:47:25 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > On 13.10.2006 [12:02:44 +1000], David Gibson wrote:
> > > > Nish, or someone else who understands the shari
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 04:27:42PM -0500, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 09:26 -0500, Steve Fox wrote:
>
> > Instead of creating the shared mapping of size memsz (aligned), we're
> > going to make it only filesz + non-zero BSS (we've found that glibc
> > initializes stdin, stdout, stderr
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:07:28AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 17:27 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > At present we compile both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of hugetlbd,
> > which is silly since we neither need nor can run more than one. This
> > patch alters the Makefile to only
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:48:36PM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 16:53 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > Oops, missed a couple of things. Please apply this rather than
> > previous versions of this change.
> >
> > Remove elflink specific functions out of hugeutils.c
> >
> > This
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 05:14:00PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 13.10.2006 [12:47:25 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 13.10.2006 [12:02:44 +1000], David Gibson wrote:
> > > Nish, or someone else who understands the sharing implementation:
> > >
> > > Can you explain to me the ne
