Adam, please apply.
At present, we disable the functions for producing debugging output if
the __syscall_return macro is not available. However, we only
actually need the __syscall_return macro on i386, in order to redefine
some of the other _syscall*() macro because the standard versions
don't w
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:04:58PM -0500, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 14:48 -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > I think the part about mount point permissions should be revised for
> > clarity. How about the following? :
> >
> > We recommend creating your hugetlbfs mount point with restrict
socket to /var/run to avoid this problem. Note
that on most systems, hugetlbd will need to be run as root in order to
create the socket in the more secure /var/run directory.
Signed-off-by: Adam Litke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -purN libhugetlbfs-dev-20061026.orig/hugetlbd.c
libhugetlb
Adam didn't propose anything clever for the release name, so here's my
suggestion :)
Signed-off-by: Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
libhugetlbfs 1.0.1 "Spicy Garlic"
==
This small maintenance release brings a security fix, a few
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 14:48 -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> I think the part about mount point permissions should be revised for
> clarity. How about the following? :
>
> We recommend creating your hugetlbfs mount point with restricted
> permissions that permit only a specific user or group to access
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 14:33 -0500, Steve Fox wrote:
> docs: Add security section to README
>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/README b/README
> index bff0b68..88b2b16 100644
> --- a/README
> +++ b/README
> @@ -40,3 +40,14 @@ (including all libhugetlbfs debug o
docs: Add security section to README
Signed-off-by: Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/README b/README
index bff0b68..88b2b16 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -40,3 +40,14 @@ (including all libhugetlbfs debug output
libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net and we'll help out as mu
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 10:35 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:46:28PM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > ldscripts: Missing bss section placement statement
> >
> > This appears to be a longstanding bug in the ppc32 .xB linker script. When
> > the
> > BSS was moved into its own ht
Latest version of the daemon killing patch. I've cleaned up the
previously rather contorted code paths for sharing in elflink.c. Next
step per-user hugetlbfs directories. For sure, this time ;-).
Index: libhugetlbfs/HOWTO
===
--- l
