On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 01:49:48PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 14.11.2006 [15:28:37 -0600], Adam Litke wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 09:55 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > On 14.11.2006 [12:29:01 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > > diff --git a/tests/run_tests.sh b/tests/run_test
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 02:33:59PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 14.11.2006 [12:21:36 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm hitting a brick wall debugging the linkshare segfaults I'm seeing.
> >
> > (These logs are from my 2-way x86_64, but I'm seeing similar issues
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:34:56AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> With threaded binaries, it can be quite annoying to see single line
> outputs of "done", as I'm experiencing while debugging the linkshare
> testcase. At a minimum, I think, since this is a DEBUG_CONT(), we should
> add ellipses
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:48:16AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> David,
>
> On 14.11.2006 [09:10:25 -0600], Adam Litke wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 14:50 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > > +/* Possibly these functions should go in the library itself.. */
> >
> > Yes, exactly what I was go
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 13:49 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> diff --git a/tests/run_tests.sh b/tests/run_tests.sh
> index a511aa1..041afe6 100755
> --- a/tests/run_tests.sh
> +++ b/tests/run_tests.sh
> @@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ function hugetlbfs_path() {
> fi
> }
>
> +function clear_hpages() {
On 14.11.2006 [12:21:36 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm hitting a brick wall debugging the linkshare segfaults I'm seeing.
>
> (These logs are from my 2-way x86_64, but I'm seeing similar issues on a G5
> (ppc64):
>
> HUGETLB_SHARE=2 xB.linkshare 2 (32):PASS
> HUGETLB_SH
On 14.11.2006 [15:28:37 -0600], Adam Litke wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 09:55 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 14.11.2006 [12:29:01 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > diff --git a/tests/run_tests.sh b/tests/run_tests.sh
> > index d0be9d1..adda47c 100755
> > --- a/tests/run_tests.sh
> > +++ b
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 09:55 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 14.11.2006 [12:29:01 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> diff --git a/tests/run_tests.sh b/tests/run_tests.sh
> index d0be9d1..adda47c 100755
> --- a/tests/run_tests.sh
> +++ b/tests/run_tests.sh
> @@ -75,10 +75,15 @@ elfshare_test () {
>
Hi all,
I'm hitting a brick wall debugging the linkshare segfaults I'm seeing.
(These logs are from my 2-way x86_64, but I'm seeing similar issues on a G5
(ppc64):
HUGETLB_SHARE=2 xB.linkshare 2 (32):PASS
HUGETLB_SHARE=2 xB.linkshare 2 (64):PASS
HUGETLB_SHARE=1 xB.linkshare 2 (32):FA
With threaded binaries, it can be quite annoying to see single line
outputs of "done", as I'm experiencing while debugging the linkshare
testcase. At a minimum, I think, since this is a DEBUG_CONT(), we should
add ellipses.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/elfli
On 14.11.2006 [12:29:01 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 04:46:14PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 02.11.2006 [11:52:41 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:26:12AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Ok. I tend to think it
David,
On 14.11.2006 [09:10:25 -0600], Adam Litke wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 14:50 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > +/* Possibly these functions should go in the library itself.. */
>
> Yes, exactly what I was going to suggest. These are sufficiently
> useful to other potential users that I th
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 14:50 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> +/* Possibly these functions should go in the library itself.. */
Yes, exactly what I was going to suggest. These are sufficiently useful
to other potential users that I think they should go in hugeutils.c from
the start. Other than that,
13 matches
Mail list logo
