On 29.11.2006 [10:15:30 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:49:03PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 16.11.2006 [10:50:13 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 01:09:07PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > > On 15.11.2006 [10:41:19 +1100], David
On 29.11.2006 [09:34:06 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:10:26PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 12.11.2006 [11:20:13 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 01:46:41PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > > On 10.11.2006 [14:35:30 +1100], David
On 29.11.2006 [09:38:28 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:18:05PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 28.11.2006 [13:51:28 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > On 28.11.2006 [10:41:13 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 12:21:05PM -0800, Nisha
On 13.11.2006 [06:09:11 +], Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> fix up duplicate share_path definition following miss-merge
>
> It appears that commit 17c61426b3fd53846b6e7bad33ba02ce16e9fef2
> resulted in a miss-merge. The combined diff shows that the declaration
> of share_path was duplicated. Remove
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:49:03PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 16.11.2006 [10:50:13 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 01:09:07PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > On 15.11.2006 [10:41:19 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 02:33:59PM -0
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:10:26PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 12.11.2006 [11:20:13 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 01:46:41PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > On 10.11.2006 [14:35:30 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > > > Two things to make debugging easier:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:18:05PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 28.11.2006 [13:51:28 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 28.11.2006 [10:41:13 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 12:21:05PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>
> > > Huh? Setting HUGETLB_PATH sh
On 28.11.2006 [16:07:41 -0600], Adam Litke wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:49 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 16.11.2006 [10:50:13 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 01:09:07PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > > On 15.11.2006 [10:41:19 +1100], David Gibson w
On 28.11.2006 [13:51:28 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 28.11.2006 [10:41:13 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 12:21:05PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > Huh? Setting HUGETLB_PATH should work fine. It even won't have
> > problems with spaces, as long as the do
On 12.11.2006 [11:20:13 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 01:46:41PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 10.11.2006 [14:35:30 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > > Two things to make debugging easier:
> > > - Use an fflush() after each verbose_printf(), so that line
> > > buf
On 13.11.2006 [17:16:58 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> The default value of ARFLAGS provided by make is "rv", which tells ar
> to be verbose, listing each object it adds to the archive. When
> building without V=1, this interrupts flow of brief messages from
> VECHO, making genuine warnings slightl
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:49 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 16.11.2006 [10:50:13 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 01:09:07PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > On 15.11.2006 [10:41:19 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 02:33:59PM -0800, Ni
On 14.11.2006 [13:39:54 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> On powerpc with 4K base page size, the truncate_above_4GB test fails
> in an uninteresting way (i.e. not because of the bug it was designed
> to catch). This because the 'buggy_offset' it calculates is not
> hugepage aligned, so the map at this
On 13.11.2006 [13:37:32 -0600], Adam Litke wrote:
> tests: Fix zero_filesize_segment testcase
>
> This testcase is implemented as a linker script which can be "compiled"
> like a program. As such, the caveats with .note.ABI-tag and .note.SuSE
> in our other linker scripts apply here as well. Add
On 13.11.2006 [15:46:39 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> The kernel (correctly) returns EINVAL if you attempt a hugepage
> mapping with a file offset which is not hugepage aligned. However,
> current kernels have a bug in the corresponding backout path, which
> attempts to use the normal unmap_region
On 13.11.2006 [06:09:11 +], Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> fix up duplicate share_path definition following miss-merge
>
> It appears that commit 17c61426b3fd53846b6e7bad33ba02ce16e9fef2
> resulted in a miss-merge. The combined diff shows that the declaration
> of share_path was duplicated. Remove
On 28.11.2006 [10:41:13 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 12:21:05PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > [resending due to user error on my end]
> >
> > On 20.11.2006 [10:45:49 -0800], Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 09:55 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > >
On 16.11.2006 [10:50:13 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 01:09:07PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 15.11.2006 [10:41:19 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 02:33:59PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > > On 14.11.2006 [12:21:36 -0800], Nisha
On 13.11.2006 [17:16:58 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> The default value of ARFLAGS provided by make is "rv", which tells ar
> to be verbose, listing each object it adds to the archive. When
> building without V=1, this interrupts flow of brief messages from
> VECHO, making genuine warnings slightl
19 matches
Mail list logo
