at 2011/6/14 9:07, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:57:08PM +0800, Yu Huang wrote:
>> Thanks for David and Eric's suggestion!
>>
>> Before I submit the updated patch I would like to show some testing
>> result under mips arch. I used NPB3.3-SER as the benchmark to test
>> libhugetlb
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 09:06:16AM -0500, Andrew Hastings wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 09:40 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:50 PM, David Gibson
> > wrote:
[snip]
> Actually, in thinking about this some more I wonder if the
> implementation ought to be using sbrk instead of mmap?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 02:54:46PM +0800, bill wrote:
> At 2011-06-10 09:28:52，"David Gibson" wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 04:50:50PM +0800, bill wrote:
> >> Hi, guys:)
> >>
> >>
> >> In order to run a program based on huge page, either insert
> >> PF_LINUX_HUGETLB in
> >> program heade
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:57:08PM +0800, Yu Huang wrote:
> Thanks for David and Eric's suggestion!
>
> Before I submit the updated patch I would like to show some testing
> result under mips arch. I used NPB3.3-SER as the benchmark to test
> libhugetlbfs for MIPS, here is a sample result:
>
>
What the patch is:
As we all known that libhugetlbfs only supports ppc, s390, sparc, ia64, x86
and x86_64 architecture. This patch make libhugetlbfs avaliable to MIPS
architecture.
What it does:
This patch adds hugepage support to .bss .data .text and .heap segment in
MIPS architect
Thanks for David and Eric's suggestion!
Before I submit the updated patch I would like to show some testing
result under mips arch. I used NPB3.3-SER as the benchmark to test
libhugetlbfs for MIPS, here is a sample result:
==
B
On 06/08/2011 09:40 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:50 PM, David Gibson
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:16:42AM -0500, Andrew Hastings wrote:
>>> On 06/07/11 11:08, Eric B Munson wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011, Andrew Hastings wrote:
>> [snip]
> Might it make sense
