Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [PATCH] Do not create executable stacks in libhugetlbfs.so

2008-04-03 Thread Mel Gorman
On (02/04/08 14:31), Nishanth Aravamudan didst pronounce: > On 02.04.2008 [17:04:12 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote: > > On (01/04/08 19:31), Nishanth Aravamudan didst pronounce: > > > On 02.04.2008 [02:16:02 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > On (01/04/08 15:43), Nishanth Aravamudan didst pronounce: > > >

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [PATCH] Do not create executable stacks in libhugetlbfs.so

2008-04-02 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 02.04.2008 [17:04:12 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote: > On (01/04/08 19:31), Nishanth Aravamudan didst pronounce: > > On 02.04.2008 [02:16:02 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On (01/04/08 15:43), Nishanth Aravamudan didst pronounce: > > > > On 01.04.2008 [16:12:56 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > SEL

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [PATCH] Do not create executable stacks in libhugetlbfs.so

2008-04-02 Thread Mel Gorman
On (01/04/08 19:31), Nishanth Aravamudan didst pronounce: > On 02.04.2008 [02:16:02 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote: > > On (01/04/08 15:43), Nishanth Aravamudan didst pronounce: > > > On 01.04.2008 [16:12:56 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > SELinux and one distribution package lint checker (lintian in D

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [PATCH] Do not create executable stacks in libhugetlbfs.so

2008-04-01 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 02.04.2008 [02:16:02 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote: > On (01/04/08 15:43), Nishanth Aravamudan didst pronounce: > > On 01.04.2008 [16:12:56 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote: > > > SELinux and one distribution package lint checker (lintian in Debian) do > > > not like the fact that libhugetlbfs uses executabl

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [PATCH] Do not create executable stacks in libhugetlbfs.so

2008-04-01 Thread Mel Gorman
On (01/04/08 15:43), Nishanth Aravamudan didst pronounce: > On 01.04.2008 [16:12:56 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote: > > SELinux and one distribution package lint checker (lintian in Debian) do > > not like the fact that libhugetlbfs uses executable stacks. There does not > > appear to be any reason why a

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [PATCH] Do not create executable stacks in libhugetlbfs.so

2008-04-01 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 01.04.2008 [15:43:45 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 01.04.2008 [16:12:56 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote: > > SELinux and one distribution package lint checker (lintian in Debian) do > > not like the fact that libhugetlbfs uses executable stacks. There does not > > appear to be any reason why

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [PATCH] Do not create executable stacks in libhugetlbfs.so

2008-04-01 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 01.04.2008 [16:12:56 +0100], Mel Gorman wrote: > SELinux and one distribution package lint checker (lintian in Debian) do > not like the fact that libhugetlbfs uses executable stacks. There does not > appear to be any reason why an executable stack is required and appears to > be an oversight in

[Libhugetlbfs-devel] [PATCH] Do not create executable stacks in libhugetlbfs.so

2008-04-01 Thread Mel Gorman
SELinux and one distribution package lint checker (lintian in Debian) do not like the fact that libhugetlbfs uses executable stacks. There does not appear to be any reason why an executable stack is required and appears to be an oversight in the assembler files. This patch adds a section note that