Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Rework segment sharing code [Re: hugetlbd]

2006-10-15 Thread David Gibson
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:34:52PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 14.10.2006 [12:45:49 +1000], David Gibson wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 05:14:00PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > On 13.10.2006 [12:47:25 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > > On 13.10.2006 [12:02:44 +1000]

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Rework segment sharing code [Re: hugetlbd]

2006-10-14 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 14.10.2006 [12:45:49 +1000], David Gibson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 05:14:00PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On 13.10.2006 [12:47:25 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > On 13.10.2006 [12:02:44 +1000], David Gibson wrote: > > > > Nish, or someone else who understands the shari

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Rework segment sharing code [Re: hugetlbd]

2006-10-14 Thread David Gibson
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 05:14:00PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 13.10.2006 [12:47:25 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On 13.10.2006 [12:02:44 +1000], David Gibson wrote: > > > Nish, or someone else who understands the sharing implementation: > > > > > > Can you explain to me the ne

[Libhugetlbfs-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Rework segment sharing code [Re: hugetlbd]

2006-10-13 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 13.10.2006 [12:47:25 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 13.10.2006 [12:02:44 +1000], David Gibson wrote: > > Nish, or someone else who understands the sharing implementation: > > > > Can you explain to me the need for the hugetlbd? i.e. why is it > > necessary to have a daemon to manage t