On 03.03.2008 [15:07:41 -0600], Andrew Hastings wrote:
> Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>> On 29.02.2008 [15:46:44 -0600], Adam Litke wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 13:42 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>>> So Nish, I think you have the right idea on the release plans. Have
>>> we worked through the issu
Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 29.02.2008 [15:46:44 -0600], Adam Litke wrote:
>> On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 13:42 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>> So Nish, I think you have the right idea on the release plans. Have
>> we worked through the issues that were last brought up with the stack
>> remapping patc
On 29.02.2008 [15:46:44 -0600], Adam Litke wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 13:42 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 05:56:47PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > So, with the 6-patch drop I did today, we have between 23 and 29 patches
> > > post 1.2. How are folks feeling
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 13:42 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 05:56:47PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > So, with the 6-patch drop I did today, we have between 23 and 29 patches
> > post 1.2. How are folks feeling about that? I am starting to lean
> > towards cutting a 1.3
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 05:56:47PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> So, with the 6-patch drop I did today, we have between 23 and 29 patches
> post 1.2. How are folks feeling about that? I am starting to lean
> towards cutting a 1.3-rc0 release to start that cycle going.
>
> There are a few thr
So, with the 6-patch drop I did today, we have between 23 and 29 patches
post 1.2. How are folks feeling about that? I am starting to lean
towards cutting a 1.3-rc0 release to start that cycle going.
There are a few threatened features, though:
* Andrew's HUGETLB_STACK set
pros
-
