On 13.10.2006 [12:02:44 +1000], David Gibson wrote:
> Nish, or someone else who understands the sharing implementation:
>
> Can you explain to me the need for the hugetlbd? i.e. why is it
> necessary to have a daemon to manage the shared mappings, rather than
> just using a naming convention with
Nish, or someone else who understands the sharing implementation:
Can you explain to me the need for the hugetlbd? i.e. why is it
necessary to have a daemon to manage the shared mappings, rather than
just using a naming convention within the hugetlbfs to allow the
libhugetlbfs instances to direct
