Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] libhugetlbfs malloc and numa issues

2006-09-05 Thread Adam Litke
Hey Bill: Did you get any input from your team on this yet? On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 15:05 -0500, Adam Litke wrote: > We are trying to improve the reliability of the libhugetlbfs malloc > function by prefaulting the huge pages at allocation time. If we do > this, we can guarantee (for apps which d

[Libhugetlbfs-devel] HOWTO clarification for link types

2006-09-05 Thread Steve Fox
docs: Clarify that we only support BDT and B link options Signed-off-by: Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/HOWTO b/HOWTO index ab42540..58339e4 100644 --- a/HOWTO +++ b/HOWTO @@ -217,14 +217,21 @@ specially link your application. To link an application for hugepages, you should use the

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] HOWTO clarification for link types - update

2006-09-05 Thread Steve Fox
Trying this again as Nish found a grammatical error :) diff --git a/HOWTO b/HOWTO index ab42540..f08031d 100644 --- a/HOWTO +++ b/HOWTO @@ -217,14 +217,22 @@ specially link your application. To link an application for hugepages, you should use the the ld.hugetlbfs script included with libhugetlb

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] HOWTO clarification for link types - update

2006-09-05 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 05.09.2006 [17:25:55 -0500], Steve Fox wrote: > Trying this again as Nish found a grammatical error :) No S-o-b line though :( Thanks, Nish -- Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IBM Linux Technology Center - Using

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] HOWTO clarification for link types - update

2006-09-05 Thread Steve Fox
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:33 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 05.09.2006 [17:25:55 -0500], Steve Fox wrote: > > Trying this again as Nish found a grammatical error :) > > No S-o-b line though :( /me slams head against wall docs: Clarify that we only support BDT and B link options Signed-of