Re: [Libmesh-devel] ParallelMesh & Refactoring

2007-11-01 Thread Derek Gaston
I personally use ClassBase classes to mean "implementation base" as in there is a pure (or almost pure) abstract class and then there is a ClassBase class derived off of that which implements a lot of shared functionality that a further derived leaf class can then utilize. This doesn't happen

[Libmesh-devel] Should MeshBase have a pure virtual read()/write() interface?

2007-11-01 Thread John Peterson
It looks like the MeshIO classes all work on MeshBase references already. This would allow e.g. es.get_mesh().write("foo.gmv"); - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find proble

Re: [Libmesh-devel] Should MeshBase have a pure virtual read()/write() interface?

2007-11-01 Thread Roy Stogner
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, John Peterson wrote: > It looks like the MeshIO classes all work on MeshBase references > already. This would allow e.g. > > es.get_mesh().write("foo.gmv"); Sounds like a good idea to me. --- Roy - This