Dear John,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, John Peterson wrote:
> Despite it being Item 9 in the 3rd ed. of "Effective C++" I admit to
> being unaware that you should never call virtual functions in (base
> class) constructors or destructors!
Nice to hear that I'm not the only person here that didn't know
Sorry guys... I'm sitting in technical talks at Supercomputing 09
right now... I'll try to look at this tonight and get back to you...
Derek
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:35 AM, John Peterson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Roy Stogner
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Tim Kroeger wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Boyce Griffith wrote:
>>
> Can't you just call clear() in ~MyPreconditioner()?
Sure, I can. Actually, that's what I'm doing now. But for that, still the
me
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Tim Kroeger wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Boyce Griffith wrote:
>
Can't you just call clear() in ~MyPreconditioner()?
>>>
>>> Sure, I can. Actually, that's what I'm doing now. But for that, still the
>>> method Preconditioner::clear() does not have to exist, does it?
>
>> Can't you just call clear() in ~MyPreconditioner()?
>
> Sure, I can. Actually, that's what I'm doing now. But for that,
> still the method Preconditioner::clear() does not have to exist, does
> it?
I haven't used the Preconditioner class in libMesh, but this kind of
init()/clear() functio
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Boyce Griffith wrote:
>>> Can't you just call clear() in ~MyPreconditioner()?
>>
>> Sure, I can. Actually, that's what I'm doing now. But for that, still the
>> method Preconditioner::clear() does not have to exist, does it?
>
> I haven't used the Preconditioner class in l
>> Can't you just call clear() in ~MyPreconditioner()?
>
> Sure, I can. Actually, that's what I'm doing now. But for that,
> still the method Preconditioner::clear() does not have to exist, does it?
True, it doesn't have to exist... I guess it is included for consistency
with, say, System::cl
Dear David,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, David Knezevic wrote:
> Can't you just call clear() in ~MyPreconditioner()?
Sure, I can. Actually, that's what I'm doing now. But for that,
still the method Preconditioner::clear() does not have to exist, does
it?
Best Regards,
Tim
--
Dr. Tim Kroeger
tim.
Can't you just call clear() in ~MyPreconditioner()?
Tim Kroeger wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> There is a misleading matter in the Preconditioner class. That is,
> the virtual destructor calls clear(), which is itself a virtual
> function that does nothing. In my derived class (let's call it
> MyP
Dear all,
There is a misleading matter in the Preconditioner class. That is,
the virtual destructor calls clear(), which is itself a virtual
function that does nothing. In my derived class (let's call it
MyPreconditioner), I am overloading the clear() method to free some
memory that is allo
10 matches
Mail list logo
