From: David Knezevic [dkneze...@seas.harvard.edu]
> hehe I'm in Australia at the moment, it's a comfortable time in the
> afternoon down here. The real question is: Do you sleep!?
Enjoy Australia!
I was able to make it to Ostrava after all the drama, so I
On 06/18/2013 03:53 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> I'd say it's fine to include DGFEMSystem in 0.9.2. It won't break
> anything since the DG-subclass-specific features aren't used anywhere in
> the library yet.
>
> P.S. Do you want to include that new example I added, misc_ex9?
>
> I'd lo
From: David Knezevic [dkneze...@seas.harvard.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 2:44 AM
To: libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Libmesh-devel] 0.9.2 status
I'd say it's fine to include DGFEMSystem in 0.9.2. It won't break
anything since the DG-
I'd say it's fine to include DGFEMSystem in 0.9.2. It won't break
anything since the DG-subclass-specific features aren't used anywhere in
the library yet.
P.S. Do you want to include that new example I added, misc_ex9?
On 06/18/2013 03:38 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> OK, I've got
OK, I've got some time over then next two days and am hoping to release
0.9.2-rc1.
David, how is the status of the initial DG FEMSystem interface? Should I wait
on something or tag the last version before the new functionality?
-Ben
-
