Re: [Libmesh-devel] Increasing the available order for SCALAR variables?

2016-02-04 Thread Roy Stogner
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, David Knezevic wrote: > The order member in FEType is public, and it's used in many places, > so changing the order member necessitates lots of other changes in > the library (for example, consider all the methods in the FE class > that expect fe_type.order to provide an Order

Re: [Libmesh-devel] Increasing the available order for SCALAR variables?

2016-02-04 Thread David Knezevic
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > > We ought to just store order internally as an int, change the existing > constructors to convert, and add new constructors that take int. > --- > Roy > I just wanted to check in about this. The order member in FEType is public, and it's u

[Libmesh-devel] constrain_element_matrix bug?

2016-02-04 Thread Rob Blake
tl;dr: I think the 4 argument version of DofMap::constrain_element_matrix is bugged, but I can't fix it without breaking the moose tests. Help? Is the 4 argument version of constrain_element_matrix bugged? I tried to introduce incompressibility using a lagrange multiplier with hydrostatic