big plus.
Please forward this information to your colleagues that might be interested
in this opportunity. Feel free to contact me for more details.
Thanks!
Dmitry.
Dmitry Karpeyev
Computation Institute
University of Chicago
and
Argonne National Laboratory
Xujun,
You can use my fork or (probably better) create your own fork, push the
branch there and issue a pull request, when you are ready.
Let me know, if you need help with that.
Dmitry.
On Thu Dec 04 2014 at 2:14:02 PM John Peterson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Xujun Zhao wrote:
>
th a more careful algorithm we could get a much
> better estimate (if not the right answer).
>
> Derek
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Dmitry Karpeyev
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Presumably, this overestimation happens only at the "boundary" nodes i
>> that
Presumably, this overestimation happens only at the "boundary" nodes i that
are contained in elements living on other MPI ranks? Those foreign ranks
will count couplings (edges) i-j that are shared by their elements with
the elements on rank p that owns i. Since only edge counts are communicated
b
Presumably, this overestimation happens only at the "boundary" nodes i that
are contained in elements living on other MPI ranks? Those foreign ranks
will count couplings (edges) i-j that are shared by their elements with
the elements on rank p that owns i. Since only edge counts are communicated
b
Ben,
Xujun and I work on particles in fluid -- point particles for now,
generalizing to colloidal suspensions (of extended particles later).
In particular Xujun has a few ideas for using enriched bases he wanted to
try. These may be related to the basis enrichment ideas we had discussed a
few mon
f source
points in a target mesh), what would be the common pitfalls/gotchas?
Thanks for the feedback!
Dmitry.
>
> Derek
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Dmitry Karpeyev
> wrote:
>
>> John,
>>
>> Thanks for the pointer.
>> That's what we
On Feb 24, 2014 9:26 PM, "Derek Gaston" wrote:
>
> John,
>
> Thanks for working this out - I especially appreciate the gitconfig bit
(BTW - you can add that just to your libMesh repo clones by modifying the
.git/config file in just that repo).
>
> Also, I vote for:
>
>
>> if (condition)
>> {
>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2013, Dmitry Karpeyev wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Satish Balay wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 12 Dec 2013, Dmitry Karpeyev wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there any reaso
I'm attaching a small patch that fixes the relevant API differences in
'master'.
DMlibMesh is in need of a more serious overhaul, but this will make it
build and run.
Dmitry.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> John Peterson writes:
> > Ah, I'm using 3.3-p4, so that checkPESSL
Ah, okay. Ignore it, then.
Dmitry.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> Dmitry Karpeyev writes:
>
> > I'm attaching a small patch that fixes the relevant API differences in
> > 'master'.
>
> Looks like you didn't pull since Jo
sely with the University of Chicago
scientists at the Computation Institute as well as the Institute for
Molecular Engineering.
If you have questions, please feel free to contact me directly.
I apologize, if you are getting this message more than once.
Best regards,
Dmitry.
--
Dmitry Karp
ail me directly.
My apologies, if you are get this email multiple times.
Best regards,
Dmitry.
--
Dmitry Karpeyev
Mathematics and Computer Science
Argonne National Laboratory
Argonne, Illinois, USA
and
Computation Institute
University of Chicago
5735 S. Ellis Avenue
Ch
Ah, okay. Ignore it, then.
Dmitry.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> Dmitry Karpeyev writes:
>
> > I'm attaching a small patch that fixes the relevant API differences in
> > 'master'.
>
> Looks like you didn't pull since Jo
I'm attaching a small patch that fixes the relevant API differences in
'master'.
DMlibMesh is in need of a more serious overhaul, but this will make it
build and run.
Dmitry.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> John Peterson writes:
> > Ah, I'm using 3.3-p4, so that checkPESSL
Cool. Thanks, Ben.
Dmitry.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <
benjamin.k...@nasa.gov> wrote:
> On Jul 26, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Dmitry Karpeyev wrote:
>
> > This subsequently leads to extra mallocs during matrix assembly. It
> seems to me that
Dear All,
It appears to me that preallocation of blocked PETSc matrices may be
computed incorrectly in libMesh under certain circumstances. Consider the
following 9-node mesh:
8--7--9
| | |
4--3--6
| | |
1--2--5
with two first order Lagrange variables on it. Assume that _dof_cou
17 matches
Mail list logo
