Re: [Libmesh-devel] Parallel refinement

2007-11-19 Thread Roy Stogner
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Roy Stogner wrote: > I assure you, I haven't merely been breaking libMesh... except for the > commit where I broke adaptive coarsening in find_neighbors()... and > the bit where I broke MeshTools::bounding_box... And the bit where I broke DofMap::enforce_constraints_exactly()

Re: [Libmesh-devel] Parallel refinement

2007-11-16 Thread Roy Stogner
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Benjamin Kirk wrote: > What are your thoughts on how to best to avoid node duplication when > performing refinement in parallel? At the moment we do it by comparing the physical positions of each node that's newly created on a ghost element, and changing its temporary index t

[Libmesh-devel] Parallel refinement

2007-11-16 Thread Benjamin Kirk
What are your thoughts on how to best to avoid node duplication when performing refinement in parallel? The reason I ask is because I wonder if the partition-agnostic global indexing I just checked in could be used. This computes a global, unique index for each node/element based on its Hilbert k