Thanks Roy... I'll give the init() one a bit more thought... but if I
can't find a better place to cut it off then I'll just commit it
where it is.
Derek
On Apr 4, 2009, at 6:33 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Derek Gaston wrote:
>
>> Essentially it's just a short-circuiti
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Derek Gaston wrote:
> Essentially it's just a short-circuiting before the
> user_initialization() call.
Why not after user_initialization()? If a system with no variables is
being initialized, the user's doing something weird, and we should
allow the user to be weird as flex
The other day I asked about Systems without variables in them
after working this way for a few days I've found that system::init()
and system::reinit() don't quite work properly with zero variables in
the system. The problems are really only exhibited in debug mode...
tripping asserts,
