On 11/14/2012 08:46 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 7:43 PM, David Knezevic
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/14/2012 04:10 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, David Knezevic wrote:
>>>
However, I didn't want to check it in right away since it breaks some
tests
On Nov 14, 2012, at 7:43 PM, David Knezevic wrote:
>
> On 11/14/2012 04:10 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, David Knezevic wrote:
>>
>>> However, I didn't want to check it in right away since it breaks some
>>> tests with 0.8.0 around the corner. I was wondering if you might
On 11/14/2012 04:10 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, David Knezevic wrote:
>
>> However, I didn't want to check it in right away since it breaks some
>> tests with 0.8.0 around the corner. I was wondering if you might run
>> it through buildbot etc, and if it looks good at your en
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, David Knezevic wrote:
> However, I didn't want to check it in right away since it breaks some tests
> with 0.8.0 around the corner. I was wondering if you might run it through
> buildbot etc, and if it looks good at your end then I'd like to check it in
> before 0.8.0 is f
On 11/13/2012 11:38 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, David Knezevic wrote:
>
>> I'd like to add a new reduced basis example that models an acoustic
>> horn (attached). The nice thing about this one is that it tests out
>> the RB code in the --enable-complex case.
>>
>> However, I
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, David Knezevic wrote:
> I'd like to add a new reduced basis example that models an acoustic horn
> (attached). The nice thing about this one is that it tests out the RB code in
> the --enable-complex case.
>
> However, I didn't want to check it in right away since it breaks
