Thanks for the suggestions, I'm going to try both the possibilities.
Lorenzo
Il giorno 12/ott/2009, alle ore 18.01, John Peterson ha scritto:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Roy Stogner > wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Lorenzo Botti wrote:
>>
>>> I'm solving the incompressible NS equati
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Lorenzo Botti wrote:
>
>> I'm solving the incompressible NS equations with a fully implicit dg code
>> and I would like
>> to know if there is an easy way to solve for the increment instead of the
>> solution itself.
>
>
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Lorenzo Botti wrote:
> I'm solving the incompressible NS equations with a fully implicit dg code
> and I would like
> to know if there is an easy way to solve for the increment instead of the
> solution itself.
> I'm using a transient_system but maybe there is a best framewo
Hi all,
I'm solving the incompressible NS equations with a fully implicit dg code
and I would like
to know if there is an easy way to solve for the increment instead of the
solution itself.
Sometimes with non-linear fluxes building the residual on the rhs is easier
than summing
it to the product J*
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Tim Kroeger
wrote:
> Dear libMesh team,
>
> after an "svn update", today I get
>
> /home/tim/fem-libs/libMesh/libmesh-svn/libmesh/include/numerics/dense_matrix.h:381:
> error: comma at end of enumerator list
>
> in dbg and devel mode (but not in opt mode). I actu
