On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Tim Kroeger wrote:
> Just to keep this clear: NumericVector::solve_only_on() will only
> accept a list of dofs, nothing else, because in particular a
> NumericVector does not know anything about subdomain ids. On the
> other hand, System::solve_only_on() will only accept (a r
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Roy Stogner wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Tim Kroeger wrote:
>
>> I suggest to make two methods, one of which takes a vector and the other
>> takes a set. Then, the set-taking method will by default just convert the
>> set to a vector and call the vector-taking method. Roy
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Roy Stogner wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Tim Kroeger wrote:
>
>> For a dof of a vector the corresponds to a System, I need to know the
>> maximal subdomain_id of all elements which contain this dof.
>
>> While it is principally possible to determine this on the fly (via
>> El
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Tim Kroeger wrote:
> For a dof of a vector the corresponds to a System, I need to know the
> maximal subdomain_id of all elements which contain this dof.
> While it is principally possible to determine this on the fly (via
> Elem::find_point_neighbor() and then a loop over t
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Tim Kroeger wrote:
> I suggest to make two methods, one of which takes a vector and the other
> takes a set. Then, the set-taking method will by default just convert the
> set to a vector and call the vector-taking method. Roy, what do you think?
I think this is one of t
Dear all,
For a dof of a vector the corresponds to a System, I need to know the
maximal subdomain_id of all elements which contain this dof. While it
is principally possible to determine this on the fly (via
Elem::find_point_neighbor() and then a loop over the resulting
elements and a loop ov
Dear Jed,
Thank you for your help so far. I still have some questions:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Jed Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:18:30 +0200 (CEST), Tim Kroeger
> wrote:
>
>> +
>> + /**
>> + * Set of dofs to which any solve is limited (\p NULL means solve on
>> + * all dofs).
>> +
