Re: [Libmesh-users] Solve on part of domain

2010-09-16 Thread Tim Kroeger
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Jed Brown wrote: > Correct about shell and MFFD matrices. If the Mat does not implement > MatGetSubMatrix then this call returns a matrix > of type MatSubMatrix which works like you say (>=3.1). Great, thank you. I will update to 3.1 now (was using 3.0.0-p8 before). Best

Re: [Libmesh-users] Solve on part of domain

2010-09-16 Thread Jed Brown
Correct about shell and MFFD matrices. If the Mat does not implement MatGetSubMatrix then this call returns a matrix of type MatSubMatrix which works like you say (>=3.1). Preconditioning that thing obviously does not come automatically. Jed On Sep 16, 2010 8:41 AM, "Tim Kroeger" wrote: On Wed,

Re: [Libmesh-users] Solve on part of domain

2010-09-16 Thread Tim Kroeger
Here is the current state now. I have no more questions (other than the one which I asked in the previous mail). If Jed says that everything looks well now, I will do the thing for the missing overloaded PetscLinearSolver::solve() methods. -- Dr. Tim Kroeger CeVis -- Center of Complex System