On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Jed Brown wrote:
> PETSc uses const for all array arguments that are const. If any are
> missing, it's a bug. PETSc does not use const for typedefs because
> of the language (scope of const as it applies to typedefs). To have
> a const-correct API, we would either need to cre
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 21:49, Roy Stogner wrote:
> are we some kind of oddball
> nitpickers for using the const keyword in math software?
>
PETSc uses const for all array arguments that are const. If any are missing,
it's a bug. PETSc does not use const for typedefs because of the language
(scop
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote:
> I have a question related to this. Since PetscVector does not provide
> a const version of vec(), what do you do when all you have is a const
> PetscVector, for example in the residual/assembly but want to access
> the vec() explicitly ? Petsc does
Roy,
I have a question related to this. Since PetscVector does not provide
a const version of vec(), what do you do when all you have is a const
PetscVector, for example in the residual/assembly but want to access
the vec() explicitly ? Petsc does not have any "const" qualifiers and
so this needs
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Ataollah Mesgarnejad wrote:
> I was wondering if it is possible to use Libmesh along with Tao to
> do a constrained minimization? What I think is needed a way to use
> Libmesh to make PETSc Mat and Vec.
PetscMatrix::mat()
PetscVector::vec()
---
Roy
--
Dear all,
I was wondering if it is possible to use Libmesh along with Tao to do a
constrained minimization? What I think is needed a way to use Libmesh to make
PETSc Mat and Vec.
Best,
Ata
--
Simplify data backup and re
