Re: [Libmesh-users] FEClough continuity along partition boundary

2012-06-22 Thread Roy Stogner
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Ataollah Mesgarnejad wrote: > I was wondering if there is any known issues with FEClough > first derivative's continuity along mesh partition's boundaries? No problems I've encountered... but we don't have proper continuous integration tests for FEClough, I think most of the

[Libmesh-users] FEClough continuity along partition boundary

2012-06-22 Thread Ataollah Mesgarnejad
Dear all, I was wondering if there is any known issues with FEClough first derivative's continuity along mesh partition's boundaries? Thanks, Ata -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the

Re: [Libmesh-users] checking truth solution with RBConstruction

2012-06-22 Thread David Knezevic
Hi K, The print_info you're quoting are the parameters that are read in from the input file. But you can of course set parameters for any subclass of RBParametrized (which includes RBEvaluation, RBConstruction, etc) just by calling set_parameters. To check an object's current parameters, just

Re: [Libmesh-users] checking truth solution with RBConstruction

2012-06-22 Thread Kyunghoon Lee
After checking the implementation of RBParametrized::initialize_parameters (const std::string& parameters_filename) I figured out I can set the initial parameter values at the third location as follows: load_Fx = '-2. 2. 1.1' load_Fy = '-2. 2. 1.2' I wonder if this is the only way we can set th