On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Paul T. Bauman wrote:
> Reviving this thread for the DiffContext accessor changes before the next
> release.
> Attached patch, I believe, provides accessors for everything that
> should be protected in DiffContext. Wanted to get opinions before I
> went through the rest of
Reviving this thread for the DiffContext accessor changes before the next
release.
Attached patch, I believe, provides accessors for everything that should be
protected in DiffContext. Wanted to get opinions before I went through the
rest of the library code. I went through and updated, I believe,