r6248 has accessors for FEMContext. Will finish up non-rb examples
tomorrow. Let me know if there are any issues.
Best,
Paul
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download A
No one seems to care and, after talking to Roy in meat space, he didn't
seem to mind too terribly much if I kept the current API, so I did.
DiffContext accessors (and fem_system_ex1 update) committed in r6247.
FEMContext coming soon. Thanks!
On 10/29/2012 11:13 PM, Paul T. Bauman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Roy Stogner
> mailto:royst...@ices.utexas.edu>> wrote:
>
> While we're at it should we just go whole hog and
> figure out how to supply a list of sysname/varname pairs if desired
> too? That FEType para
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
> While we're at it should we just go whole hog and
> figure out how to supply a list of sysname/varname pairs if desired
> too? That FEType parameter is kind of a poor hack.
That'll be a bit more work, I think, because Exodus output, for exa
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, David Knezevic wrote:
> The attached patch does the job for me. Let me know if there are any
> suggestions, otherwise I'll go ahead and check it in.
Looks good. While we're at it should we just go whole hog and
figure out how to supply a list of sysname/varname pairs if de
The attached patch does the job for me. Let me know if there are any
suggestions, otherwise I'll go ahead and check it in.
David
On 10/29/2012 07:18 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
That would be a very, very welcome patch.
-Ben
On Oct 29, 2012, at 4:30 PM, "David Knezevic"
wrote
That would be a very, very welcome patch.
-Ben
On Oct 29, 2012, at 4:30 PM, "David Knezevic"
wrote:
> I'd like to be able to plot data from a subset of the Systems in an
> EquationSystems object. I generally use write_equation_systems, which
> writes out data from all the systems. I didn'
I'd like to be able to plot data from a subset of the Systems in an
EquationSystems object. I generally use write_equation_systems, which
writes out data from all the systems. I didn't notice functionality for
specifying a subset of the systems, but I wanted to check?
Otherwise, I guess a patch
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> You could probably leave it to David or one of the other rbOOmit
> people to fix up the reduced_basis internal code. In any case it's
> not urgent that library code be *using* the accessors before the next
> release, it's just critical that
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
I don't think there are any examples that currently show this - I'll
try to add one after the next release.
See the attached ~300 lines of code. It reads a mesh and solution, L2
projects and then plots all gradient components of all solu
That method lets you conveniently access all the elements sharing a given node,
which is not what you want in this case.
The usual way to do this is by solving an L2 projection onto a continuous field
- think of this as finding the continuous gradient field that best approximates
your disconti
Hi,
I need to extrapolate element fields to the nodes in order to compute
approximate gradients for some quantities defined at the quadrature points.
What is the easiest way to accomplish this?
I saw meshtools has a nodes to elem map function.Does this work for parallel
meshes?
Thanks.
Subraman
12 matches
Mail list logo
