On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
> So, I need to disable REpartitioning for one specific problem... what's the
> best way to go about that?
>
> Basically, I need to read a mesh, do an initial partitioning and then never
> change it again
Didn't we add MeshBase::skip_partitioning() or
So, I need to disable REpartitioning for one specific problem... what's the
best way to go about that?
Basically, I need to read a mesh, do an initial partitioning and then never
change it again
What do you guys think?
Derek
---
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
On Dec 6, 2012, at 3:44 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
We're a bit closer to "code users" (ie, non-code developers) than
you guys are though... so that policy might make more sense for us.
Really what we should probably be doing is make 'devel
On Dec 6, 2012, at 3:44 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
> We're a bit closer to "code users" (ie, non-code developers) than you guys
> are though... so that policy might make more sense for us.
Really what we should probably be doing is make 'devel' mode the default -
kinda like PETSc, you can turn of
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
> My general rule is not to do self-testing in opt mode when that
> testing has any time or memory cost.
>
> Now that you got me to think about it: in this case the costs are "a
> handful of operations and one word of memory per EquationSystems
>
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
This is what I was thinking as well... although why wrap it in
NDEBUG? This isn't time sensitive... so we should probably just
always do this check.
My general rule is not to do self-testing in opt mode when that
testing has any time or memory cost.
N
Didn't send to the list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Derek Gaston
Date: Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Libmesh-users] write_equation_systems() with several Systems
and EquationSystems
To: Roy Stogner
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
> MeshBase
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, John Peterson wrote:
>> It's a bug we should probably be trying to detect and assert against
>> in library code, though... I'm not sure how to do easily without also
>> accidentally asserting against valid usage patterns, though.
>
> And how would you do it in a complicated wa
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Jens Lohne Eftang wrote:
>
>> I'm having several EquationSystems,
>
> More importantly, you're attaching several EquationSystems to the same
> mesh. This is a bug; you'll need to instead get a mesh.clone() if you
> want a
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Jens Lohne Eftang wrote:
> I'm having several EquationSystems,
More importantly, you're attaching several EquationSystems to the same
mesh. This is a bug; you'll need to instead get a mesh.clone() if you
want a new EquationSystems attached to an identical mesh.
It's a bug w
Hi all,
I'm having several EquationSystems, and also several Systems within each
EquationSystems, and I'm using ExodusII_IO().write_equation_systems()
for plotting.
In optimized mode I do get correct results, but in devel or debug mode I
get an error when plotting. I've cooked up a minimalisti
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Ataollah Mesgarnejad wrote:
> I was wondering if there is any reasons for MeshFunction::gradient not to
> work with C1 (Clough) elements?
In theory, it should work fine. If anything I'd expect it to work
*better* for C1 elements, since the results would always be
well-defin
Dear all,
I was wondering if there is any reasons for MeshFunction::gradient not to work
with C1 (Clough) elements?
Thanks,
Ata
--
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs a
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
> In his case he is solving with over 2,000 variables
>
> We also have other users solving with 20-200 variables of the same
It would be interesting to know of other places where users are
greatly exceeding our original estimates of what "N" might be in ca
Ok done. You are right, when I write the output in Nemesis format it messes up
the gradient. You can get my tweaked adaptivity_ex4 from:
http://cl.ly/02131w2o2715 . So does this mean that this is a VisIt bug?!
PS: I had to make it so it reads a mesh file otherwise Nemesis_IO wouldn't work
and I
15 matches
Mail list logo
