lol - whoops - disregard that email... wrong one ;-)
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:05 PM, John Peterson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
> > Ling - come talk to David and or John about it if it's still not clear.
>
> ???
>
> --
> John
>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
> Ling - come talk to David and or John about it if it's still not clear.
???
--
John
--
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS
Ling - come talk to David and or John about it if it's still not clear.
Derek
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <
benjamin.kir...@nasa.gov> wrote:
> And by that I mean you get a mass matrix on the left hand side and the
> pressure gradient only shows up inside the sou
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Cody Permann wrote:
So are there any more outstanding issues for the 0.9.1 release?
Not that I've run into. There was one ugly crash-on-exit with an
openmpi build, but it's not easy to replicate and the same code works
fine with mpich2 so that shouldn't hold anything up.
So are there any more outstanding issues for the 0.9.1 release? Just
trying to get an idea of when it'll be available. We are going to deploy
this version to our users instead of wherever HEAD is at.
Thanks,
Cody
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Cody Permann wrote:
> Roy,
>
> RC1 passed all
And by that I mean you get a mass matrix on the left hand side and the
pressure gradient only shows up inside the source term, where it is integrated
inside he element and is well posed.
-Ben
On Apr 23, 2013, at 8:26 AM, "Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)"
wrote:
> Are you using a finite element
Are you using a finite element method? If so, you wind up weighting this term
under an integral and everything works out.
-Ben
On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:42 PM, "Zhang" wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> As a beginner of libMesh, I am using it to build an incompressible N-S solver
> with projectio
