Re: [Libmesh-users] LAGRANGE_VEC and mesh refinement

2014-06-05 Thread Paul T. Bauman
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Miguel Angel Salazar de Troya < salazardetr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your response. I am trying to modify the > ProjectVector::operator() function to be able to handle the LAGRANGE_VEC. > One of the first things this function does is this (line 782 at > sys

Re: [Libmesh-users] LAGRANGE_VEC and mesh refinement

2014-06-05 Thread Miguel Angel Salazar de Troya
Thanks for your response. I am trying to modify the ProjectVector::operator() function to be able to handle the LAGRANGE_VEC. One of the first things this function does is this (line 782 at system_projection.C ) AutoPtr fe (FEBase::build(dim, base_fe_type)) This function does not handle the fe_ty

Re: [Libmesh-users] Configure error checking vtk

2014-06-05 Thread Roy Stogner
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, John Peterson wrote: Seriously?!   /usr/lib/vtk/*.so starts to sound like a viable option... With surprisingly little exaggeration, and I disagree: $ ls /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libvtk*.so | wc 471 471 26374 Since this turned out not to be urgent for anyone

Re: [Libmesh-users] Configure error checking vtk

2014-06-05 Thread John Peterson
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Jun 2014, Josué Barroso wrote: > > I think that I can work with vtk 5.8It worked at the configuration step >> > > Glad to hear it! > > Upon first inspection, the problem with VTK 6 seems to be that they > now have a separate .so f

Re: [Libmesh-users] Configure error checking vtk

2014-06-05 Thread Roy Stogner
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014, Josué Barroso wrote: I think that I can work with vtk 5.8It worked at the configuration step Glad to hear it! Upon first inspection, the problem with VTK 6 seems to be that they now have a separate .so file for nearly every individual API function, with the exceptions of

Re: [Libmesh-users] Exodus not working

2014-06-05 Thread Lorenzo Zanon
Hi, I contacted the netCDF support. They basically couldn't tell me what exactly was going wrong, but at the end they said > I'm going to recommend that you start over with the current > release of netCDF-C, version 4.3.2, and build and install that. Then > I recommend that you build and instal