If you are referring to equation 3.30, yes this should be a good estimator
for the L2 error once the constant C has been obtained. The duality trick
(Aubin-Nitsche) gives us the extra powers of h, which we expect to see in
the L2 convergence.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Salazar De Troya, Migue
I found an error estimator in the L2 norm here:
https://www.ices.utexas.edu/sites/oden/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/1997-006.a_posteriori.pdf
, Pag 23. Is this a good error estimator to use or is it the forward euler of
the error indicators?
Thanks
From: mailto:simulation...@gmail.com>> on behal
Hello Salazar,
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Salazar De Troya, Miguel <
salazardet...@llnl.gov> wrote:
> My problem with patch recovery is that it cannot be used across an
> interface where the gradient is discontinuous.
>
I would say that even in cases where the gradient is discontinuous, pat
My problem with patch recovery is that it cannot be used across an interface
where the gradient is discontinuous. I also see that one has to be careful when
using other error indicators because they might be designed for the error in
the energy norm or the complete H1 norm, whereas your weightin
