> On May 8, 2017, at 5:22 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2017, Rossi, Simone wrote:
>
>> If I understand you correctly, performing more than one AMR step at
>> every timestep is “inefficient”. The strategy should be to run with
>> a fixed locally refined mesh for N timestep, befo
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017, Rossi, Simone wrote:
If I understand you correctly, performing more than one AMR step at
every timestep is “inefficient”. The strategy should be to run with
a fixed locally refined mesh for N timestep, before running a new
adaptive step.
Yes, although N=1 is often reason
