r6248 has accessors for FEMContext. Will finish up non-rb examples
tomorrow. Let me know if there are any issues.
Best,
Paul
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download A
No one seems to care and, after talking to Roy in meat space, he didn't
seem to mind too terribly much if I kept the current API, so I did.
DiffContext accessors (and fem_system_ex1 update) committed in r6247.
FEMContext coming soon. Thanks!
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> You could probably leave it to David or one of the other rbOOmit
> people to fix up the reduced_basis internal code. In any case it's
> not urgent that library code be *using* the accessors before the next
> release, it's just critical that
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Paul T. Bauman wrote:
> Reviving this thread for the DiffContext accessor changes before the next
> release.
> Attached patch, I believe, provides accessors for everything that
> should be protected in DiffContext. Wanted to get opinions before I
> went through the rest of
Reviving this thread for the DiffContext accessor changes before the next
release.
Attached patch, I believe, provides accessors for everything that should be
protected in DiffContext. Wanted to get opinions before I went through the
rest of the library code. I went through and updated, I believe,
On Jun 25, 2012, at 7:40 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
> Forwarding this to libmesh-users. It looks like you're actually
> keeping full backwards API compatibility in FEMContext,
For the moment, yes.
> and I'd like
> to hear if there are any opinions from other FEMSystem/RB people about
> how long (i
The RB API has been changing (improving!) a lot recently, so certainly
no complaints from me if you break backwards compatibility in FEMContext
whenever is convenient.
David
On 06/25/2012 08:40 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> Forwarding this to libmesh-users. It looks like you're actually
> keepin
Forwarding this to libmesh-users. It looks like you're actually
keeping full backwards API compatibility in FEMContext, and I'd like
to hear if there are any opinions from other FEMSystem/RB people about
how long (in months? release versions?) that should be maintained.
---
Roy
-- Forwa