Re: [Libmesh-users] [Libmesh-devel] FEMContext and FEAbstract (fwd)

2012-10-29 Thread Paul T. Bauman
r6248 has accessors for FEMContext. Will finish up non-rb examples tomorrow. Let me know if there are any issues. Best, Paul -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download A

Re: [Libmesh-users] [Libmesh-devel] FEMContext and FEAbstract (fwd)

2012-10-29 Thread Paul T. Bauman
No one seems to care and, after talking to Roy in meat space, he didn't seem to mind too terribly much if I kept the current API, so I did. DiffContext accessors (and fem_system_ex1 update) committed in r6247. FEMContext coming soon. Thanks!

Re: [Libmesh-users] [Libmesh-devel] FEMContext and FEAbstract (fwd)

2012-10-29 Thread Paul T. Bauman
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > > You could probably leave it to David or one of the other rbOOmit > people to fix up the reduced_basis internal code. In any case it's > not urgent that library code be *using* the accessors before the next > release, it's just critical that

Re: [Libmesh-users] [Libmesh-devel] FEMContext and FEAbstract (fwd)

2012-10-28 Thread Roy Stogner
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Paul T. Bauman wrote: > Reviving this thread for the DiffContext accessor changes before the next > release. > Attached patch, I believe, provides accessors for everything that > should be protected in DiffContext. Wanted to get opinions before I > went through the rest of

Re: [Libmesh-users] [Libmesh-devel] FEMContext and FEAbstract (fwd)

2012-10-28 Thread Paul T. Bauman
Reviving this thread for the DiffContext accessor changes before the next release. Attached patch, I believe, provides accessors for everything that should be protected in DiffContext. Wanted to get opinions before I went through the rest of the library code. I went through and updated, I believe,

Re: [Libmesh-users] [Libmesh-devel] FEMContext and FEAbstract (fwd)

2012-06-25 Thread Paul T. Bauman
On Jun 25, 2012, at 7:40 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > Forwarding this to libmesh-users. It looks like you're actually > keeping full backwards API compatibility in FEMContext, For the moment, yes. > and I'd like > to hear if there are any opinions from other FEMSystem/RB people about > how long (i

Re: [Libmesh-users] [Libmesh-devel] FEMContext and FEAbstract (fwd)

2012-06-25 Thread David Knezevic
The RB API has been changing (improving!) a lot recently, so certainly no complaints from me if you break backwards compatibility in FEMContext whenever is convenient. David On 06/25/2012 08:40 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > > Forwarding this to libmesh-users. It looks like you're actually > keepin

Re: [Libmesh-users] [Libmesh-devel] FEMContext and FEAbstract (fwd)

2012-06-25 Thread Roy Stogner
Forwarding this to libmesh-users. It looks like you're actually keeping full backwards API compatibility in FEMContext, and I'd like to hear if there are any opinions from other FEMSystem/RB people about how long (in months? release versions?) that should be maintained. --- Roy -- Forwa