On Jun 9, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
> "TransientSystem" is taken.
> "TransientBaseSystem"?
TransientSystemBase?
Either is fine with me.
Derek
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Derek Gaston wrote:
> I think this makes sense... and have thought about doing it myself.
>
> One reason to still use an ExplicitSystem (or actually a
> TransientExplicitSystem) is because you might need old values. So
> if you're going to do this should we make a "TransientS
I think this makes sense... and have thought about doing it myself.
One reason to still use an ExplicitSystem (or actually a
TransientExplicitSystem) is because you might need old values. So if you're
going to do this should we make a "TransientSystem" as well that just has
solution vectors fo
> So here's a simple question I should have come up with years ago: Why
> do we suggest *Explicit*System for storing element data? That system
> allocates a rhs vector for use in solve(), but if you're only wanting
> to store (and project, distribute, read/write...) data fields then the
> rhs is
