lol - whoops - disregard that email... wrong one ;-)
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:05 PM, John Peterson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
> > Ling - come talk to David and or John about it if it's still not clear.
>
> ???
>
> --
> John
>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
> Ling - come talk to David and or John about it if it's still not clear.
???
--
John
--
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS
Ling - come talk to David and or John about it if it's still not clear.
Derek
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <
benjamin.kir...@nasa.gov> wrote:
> And by that I mean you get a mass matrix on the left hand side and the
> pressure gradient only shows up inside the sou
And by that I mean you get a mass matrix on the left hand side and the
pressure gradient only shows up inside the source term, where it is integrated
inside he element and is well posed.
-Ben
On Apr 23, 2013, at 8:26 AM, "Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)"
wrote:
> Are you using a finite element
Are you using a finite element method? If so, you wind up weighting this term
under an integral and everything works out.
-Ben
On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:42 PM, "Zhang" wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> As a beginner of libMesh, I am using it to build an incompressible N-S solver
> with projectio
Dear all,
As a beginner of libMesh, I am using it to build an incompressible N-S solver
with projection method.
When I am trying to calculate as follows,
u^{n+1}=u^{n}-dt*grad(p),
I wonder how to project the pressure gradient grad(p) in Q1 space into the
velocity u 's space Q2. Is there
a
