On Fri, 6 Nov 2015, Miguel Angel Salazar de Troya wrote:
>> I found out I can use elem->id () == mesh.processor_id() instead of
>> elem->is_remote().
This is what the _local_ iterators (that John recommended, IIRC) do
for you.
>> However, there's a problem when I iterate over all the
>> element
I pressed reply instead of reply all...
On Nov 6, 2015 10:50 AM, "Miguel Angel Salazar de Troya" <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I found out I can use elem->id () == mesh.processor_id() instead of
> elem->is_remote(). However, there's a problem when I iterate over all the
> elements and it's
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Miguel Angel Salazar de Troya <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm trying to do the following operation. I want to iterate over all the
> elements using the iterators active_elements_begin()/end().
You can use the active_local_elements_begin()/end()
Hello
I'm trying to do the following operation. I want to iterate over all the
elements using the iterators active_elements_begin()/end(). Then I'm using
Elem::is_remote () to check if the element is local to the processor and
modify a global vector from a system that has one dof per element. Afte
