On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Roy Stogner wrote:
> In the short term the workaround ought to be to use
> WRITE_SERIAL_FILES; I'm not sure that's working but if it's not I'll
> try to fix it ASAP.
WRITE_SERIAL_FILES | WRITE_DATA works.
Parallel xda mesh support ought to be relatively easy to add, but I'm
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Roy Stogner wrote:
> You know what? It doesn't for me either, my previous reports to the
> contrary. But that use case *should* work, and does work on lots of
> other meshes I've tried. I'll keep looking into it.
And now I think I understand the problem. Our solution res
You may be interested in the "Checkpoint" mesh format:
https://github.com/libMesh/libmesh/blob/master/include/mesh/checkpoint_io.h
It is still XDR based... but basically just writes out the raw mesh as it
sits on each processor and then reads it back in during a restart. Because
of this you have
I didn’t know the numbering could change. Now it makes sense. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Miguel A. Salazar de Troya
Graduate Scholar, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Ph.D. Candidate, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
T1878
Rm: 112
Ext: 2-6411
L-code: 288
On 1/14/16, 11:13 AM, "Roy Sto
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Salazar De Troya, Miguel wrote:
Sorry the last statement is wrong. Leaving partition_agnostic=true with a
SerialMesh doesn’t return the same assertion error, but the vector written
and the vector read are not the same when I print them. The values seem to
be in different or
Sorry the last statement is wrong. Leaving partition_agnostic=true with a
SerialMesh doesn’t return the same assertion error, but the vector written
and the vector read are not the same when I print them. The values seem to
be in different order.
Miguel A. Salazar de Troya
Graduate Scholar, Lawr
Leaving partition_agnostic=true gives me the same assertion error on
SerialMesh as well.
Sincerely,
Miguel A. Salazar de Troya
Graduate Scholar, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Ph.D. Candidate, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
T1878
Rm: 112
Ext: 2-6411
L-code: 288
On 1/14/16,
In that case, what would be the compatible way to restart the mesh if I
still leave partition_agnostic=false? What would be the way to fix the
code? Leaving partition_agnostic=true doesn¹t avoid the assertion either
for me.
Sincerely,
Miguel A. Salazar de Troya
Graduate Scholar, Lawrence Livermor
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016, Roy Stogner wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, Salazar De Troya, Miguel wrote:
I’m attaching a simple code that illustrates the problem. I open a
mesh (l_problem.xda) and perform a uniform refinement (if I don’t,
there are no problems), then I create an ExplicitSystem and ass
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, Salazar De Troya, Miguel wrote:
I’m attaching a simple code that illustrates the problem. I open a
mesh (l_problem.xda) and perform a uniform refinement (if I don’t,
there are no problems), then I create an ExplicitSystem and assign
random values to its solution. I print th
Sorry I sent the email to only John Peterson by mistake. The code is here
http://paste.ofcode.org/XqU3mKRdgGnQQZRveVwKRr and the l_problem.xda file:
http://justpaste.it/qe3i
Is it possible to attach files on this mail list? I did that for my
original message by it looks like it didn¹t get through.
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, John Peterson wrote:
>> I get this assertion error:
>>
>>
>> Assertion `cnt < io_buffer.size()' failed.
>>
>> cnt = 12755
>>
>> io_buffer.size() = 12755
Hmm... I'm seeing the same assertion error on a ParallelMesh restart
of a "slit mesh", with overlapping nodes, but I haven
alazar mailto:salazardet...@llnl.gov>>
Cc:
"libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net>"
mailto:libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: Re: [Libmesh-users] ParallelMesh, SerialMesh and simulation restarts
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Salazar De Troya, Miguel <
salazardet...@llnl.gov> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I’m attaching a simple code that illustrates the problem. I open a mesh
> (l_problem.xda) and perform a uniform refinement (if I don’t, there are no
> problems), then I create an ExplicitSystem
Hello
I’m attaching a simple code that illustrates the problem. I open a mesh
(l_problem.xda) and perform a uniform refinement (if I don’t, there are no
problems), then I create an ExplicitSystem and assign random values to its
solution. I print the solution for verification purposes. I save bo
15 matches
Mail list logo
