I see what you mean. In the meantime, I worked out how to automatically
generate meshes where the boundary faces have a matching discretization,
and I'm trying to work with PeriodicBoundary. However, I always get a
"Periodic boundary neighbor not found" error. I thought the matched-face
meshing mig
In that sense of "unstructured", strong enforcement of periodic
boundaries would lead to "locking". Imagine piecewise linear or
bilinear elements, with nodes like:
AB--C--D--E-F
on one side of the boundary and
G-H---I-J---K---L
on the other.
Side AB forces GH and HI to have the
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Bailey Curzadd wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm using libMesh to calculate the homogenized properties of
> microstructures with cuboid unit cells. To do this, the boundaries of the
> unit cell require periodic boundary conditions. As far as I can tell,
> though, the Peri
Posting reply to list.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:40 AM Bailey Curzadd wrote:
> That's correct.
>
> Paul T. Bauman schrieb am Di., 7. Aug. 2018, 15:32:
>
>> To clarify, do you mean unstructured here in the sense that the two
>> boundaries that are to be periodic are not simply a translation of on
Didn't hit reply-all.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:31 AM Paul T. Bauman wrote:
> To clarify, do you mean unstructured here in the sense that the two
> boundaries that are to be periodic are not simply a translation of one
> another? E.g. nodes do not match up?
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:08 AM Bail
Hi there,
I'm using libMesh to calculate the homogenized properties of
microstructures with cuboid unit cells. To do this, the boundaries of the
unit cell require periodic boundary conditions. As far as I can tell,
though, the PeriodicBoundary class only works with structured meshes, which
isn't r
