Thanks, I might end up doing that. But, I need to write the node position
in order according to there global ids, so looping through the nodes
doesn't provide the nodes in order. So, I would need to store the node
data, sort it, then write it. This is possible, I am just exploring simpler
alternati
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Andrew E Slaughter <
andrew.e.slaugh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Roy, I need to loop over the local nodes as well as the elements. When I
> did this with local_nodes_begin() and local_nodes_end() it works except
> that the nodes did not repeat for elements. For example
Roy, I need to loop over the local nodes as well as the elements. When I
did this with local_nodes_begin() and local_nodes_end() it works except
that the nodes did not repeat for elements. For example if element 1 is on
processes 1 that process may contain all the nodes for the element. If
element
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Andrew E Slaughter wrote:
> I think I might of solved my problem by disabling the partitioning on the
> pid_mesh (pid_mesh.skip_partioning(true)). I still need to do some testing.
Why create the pid_mesh in the first place? If you want each
processor to work on its local el
I think I might of solved my problem by disabling the partitioning on the
pid_mesh (pid_mesh.skip_partioning(true)). I still need to do some testing.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Andrew E Slaughter <
andrew.e.slaugh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I am working on writing files in parallel and
Hello,
I am working on writing files in parallel and would like to work on each
portion of the partitioned mesh, so I am trying to work with the
create_pid_mesh. If I understand correctly, this function should create a
Mesh object that behaves like an unpartitioned mesh, so if I have a file
that ca
