On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, water force wrote:
> Yes this algorithm seems uncommon because the material properties
> associated with these meshes are different. Is there any other
> elegant way to do this?
It should have been obvious from your code, but no - if your
material properties affect the Jacobi
Thanks for your comments! A bug in my assemble function did result in the
segfault. Actually I used attach_assemble_object in my code but made a
mistake when passing the string sys_name to the constructor in the assembly
class. Yes this algorithm seems uncommon because the material properties
assoc
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:23 PM, water force wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a couple of meshes, each with the same linear equations and boundary
> conditions. Then I tried to solve them in a loop in the following way:
>
> for (int i = 0; i < number_of_meshes; i++)
> {
> EquationSystems es( mesh[i] )
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, water force wrote:
> I have a couple of meshes, each with the same linear equations and boundary
> conditions. Then I tried to solve them in a loop in the following way:
>
> for (int i = 0; i < number_of_meshes; i++)
> {
>EquationSystems es( mesh[i] );
>es.add_system(s
Hello,
I have a couple of meshes, each with the same linear equations and boundary
conditions. Then I tried to solve them in a loop in the following way:
for (int i = 0; i < number_of_meshes; i++)
{
EquationSystems es( mesh[i] );
es.add_system(sys_name);
es.get_system(sys_name).add_va
