On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, Michael Povolotskyi wrote:
I added a plain System class, and it worked.
Thanks! That was fast! (possibly causality-violatingly so? I could
swear I saw this message header in my inbox *before* I hit send on my
own previous message...)
---
Roy
Michael.
On 01/25/2018
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, Michael Povolotskyi wrote:
Can I add just a plain System to the EquationSystem?
That's actually a good question, and if you'd try it and report back
I'd appreciate it.
The answer used to be "no", which is why everybody habitually
recommends adding ExplicitSystem for stor
I added a plain System class, and it worked.
Michael.
On 01/25/2018 12:17 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, Michael Povolotskyi wrote:
I will add another system and will not solve it.
Make sure it's ExplicitSystem (no, wait, maybe just plain System?
ExplicitSystem does still all
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, Michael Povolotskyi wrote:
I will add another system and will not solve it.
Make sure it's ExplicitSystem (no, wait, maybe just plain System?
ExplicitSystem does still allocate an rhs, not just a solution).
ImplicitSystem will try to allocate a Jacobian for you whether y
On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, Paul T. Bauman wrote:
Sorry for slow response. I have nothing better to offer other than 3
vectors, but maybe others will.
You can add another ExplicitSystem to the mesh, giving it a
vector-valued variable corresponding to your solution system's
scalar-valued variable.
T
Sorry for slow response. I have nothing better to offer other than 3
vectors, but maybe others will.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Michael Povolotskyi
wrote:
> Dear Libmesh developers and users,
>
> I need to compute a field on mesh based on a solution.
>
> To do so I usually add a vector to
Dear Libmesh developers and users,
I need to compute a field on mesh based on a solution.
To do so I usually add a vector to a system and fill it with data.
This works perfectly for a scalar field.
What would you recommend to do for a vector field.
Of course, I can add 3 vectors, one for each
