cators?
>
> Thanks
>
> From: on behalf of Vikram Garg <
> vikram.v.g...@gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, September 9, 2016 at 2:13 PM
>
> To: Miguel Salazar
> Cc: "libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net" sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Libmesh-users] Du
dnesday, September 7, 2016 at 10:00 AM
To: Miguel Salazar mailto:salazardet...@llnl.gov>>
Cc:
"libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net>"
mailto:libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: Re: [Libmesh-users] Dual weighted
mesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net" sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Libmesh-users] Dual weighted residual error estimator in
> libMesh
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Salazar De Troya, Miguel <
> salazardet...@llnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> In the case I used the Adjoi
o:salazardet...@llnl.gov>>
Cc:
"libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net>"
mailto:libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: Re: [Libmesh-users] Dual weighted residual error estimator in libMesh
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Sal
t;
> Thanks
> Miguel
> From: on behalf of Vikram Garg <
> vikram.v.g...@gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 7:19 PM
> To: Miguel Salazar
> Cc: "libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net" sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Libmesh-users] Dual weighte
am.v.g...@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 7:19 PM
To: Miguel Salazar mailto:salazardet...@llnl.gov>>
Cc:
"libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net>"
mailto:libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: Re
Hi Miguel,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Salazar De Troya, Miguel <
salazardet...@llnl.gov> wrote:
>
>
> I started learning about the dual weighted residual error estimator. From
> what I read here: http://cadmus.usc.edu/UQ-SummerSchool-2013/bauman.pdf
Well there's a blast from the past.
> t
Hello Salazar,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Salazar De Troya, Miguel <
salazardet...@llnl.gov> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I started learning about the dual weighted residual error estimator. From
> what I read here: http://cadmus.usc.edu/UQ-SummerSchool-2013/bauman.pdf
> there are two approaches in li
