It triggered the error the dbg mode once I started looking for it and
compiled in dbg mode. I first tested adapativity_ex4 with multiple
processors to make sure that there is nothing wrong with FEClough or
FEHermite.
Ata
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jun 201
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Ataollah Mesgarnejad wrote:
OK. So the constants in 4th order equation that I solve are solution
of another non-linear system. The problem was for some reason I was
not using the right ghosted solution vector in this particular
subroutine therefore the error on the partitio
OK. So the constants in 4th order equation that I solve are solution of
another non-linear system. The problem was for some reason I was not using
the right ghosted solution vector in this particular subroutine therefore
the error on the partition boundaries.
As always thanks for the constant help
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012, Ataollah Mesgarnejad wrote:
> Just wanted to let you know I found the error in my own code and as
> far as I can tell FECLough and FEHermite are both doing nicely.
Thanks very much for the update!
Is there any quick way you could summarize the error for us? In the
past we'
Roy,
Just wanted to let you know I found the error in my own code and as far as
I can tell FECLough and FEHermite are both doing nicely.
Thanks,
Ata
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Ataollah Mesgarnejad wrote:
>
> Yes. I actually calculated the magn
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Ataollah Mesgarnejad wrote:
> I was wondering if there is any known issues with FEClough
> first derivative's continuity along mesh partition's boundaries?
No problems I've encountered... but we don't have proper continuous
integration tests for FEClough, I think most of the
