On Thu, 5 Jul 2018, Renato Poli wrote:
>> It sounds like you'd rather be doing a tuple?
Well, that would be my second shot, which I consider dusty but healthy.
*Ideally* I would do a MyClass { int p1; int p2; int p3; int p4; }.
I'm afraid handling *that* automatically is not going to be poss
>> It sounds like you'd rather be doing a tuple?
Well, that would be my second shot, which I consider dusty but healthy.
*Ideally* I would do a MyClass { int p1; int p2; int p3; int p4; }.
>> I'll try setting up a unit test with that and see if I can fix ...
There's no need to hurry. I moved forwa
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Renato Poli wrote:
Thanks. Will try that.
It is constant size.
In fact, I could make my way through in a dirty pair
> >
I'm debugging something else right now.
I will have to come back later an ddo the specialization.
It sounds like you'd rather be doing a tuple?
I'll tr
Thanks. Will try that.
It is constant size.
In fact, I could make my way through in a dirty pair > >
I'm debugging something else right now.
I will have to come back later an ddo the specialization.
Thanks,
Renato
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Roy Stogner
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Renato
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Renato Poli wrote:
I am trying to implement this one: comm().allgather(vector).
The compiler fails.
It says MyClass is not a StandardType.
I tried with a tuple<>, without success.
There actually is a StandardType> specialization, but
it's untested and it's only useable i
Hi Roy
I am trying to implement this one: comm().allgather(vector).
The compiler fails.
It says MyClass is not a StandardType.
I tried with a tuple<>, without success.
Any suggestion?
Should I specialize a Packing or so?
I can see that for vector, everything works fine.
/usr/local/include/libm
Thank you!
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 6:04 PM, Roy Stogner
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2018, Renato Poli wrote:
>
> How can I do this (I am not a MPI guy at all, so please be patient ...):
>>
>
> > ... after each processor makes its own local vector, just
>> > allgather those into a giant serial vect
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018, Renato Poli wrote:
How can I do this (I am not a MPI guy at all, so please be patient ...):
> ... after each processor makes its own local vector, just
> allgather those into a giant serial vector ...
I'm not a big fan of MPI myself, which is why we've got it wrapped
> By duplicated, you just mean the multiple DoFs "at" (in a Lagrangian
> evaluation sense) each node?
Correct.
> And integration points are only on sides, so you don't have to worry
> about edges/nodes where more than two elements meet?
Correct.
> 1) You're not using a solution vector, you're u
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018, Renato Poli wrote:
I have a DG system (duplicated DOFs).
By duplicated, you just mean the multiple DoFs "at" (in a Lagrangian
evaluation sense) each node?
I calculate the aperture at the DOFs sharing coordinates
Aperture meaning the jump in values between the solutio
Ok, I see Roy's point.
Let's start over.
I have a DG system (duplicated DOFs).
I calculate the aperture at the DOFs sharing coordinates
(position_at_the_element _minus_ position_at_the_neighbor).
I do that for all integration points.
I need an ordered vector with the bigger apertures first, and I
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018, Renato Poli wrote:
Should I copy-paste code from NumericVector to build mine?
Any suggestion?
We're pretty far into XY Problem territory at this point.
http://xyproblem.info/
What you've said about your vector is that you'll need to be able to
do a maxloc() on it, that
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Renato Poli wrote:
> Should I copy-paste code from NumericVector to build mine?
> Any suggestion?
>
I definitely suggest _not_ copy/pasting code!
Another alternative is to sync the solution vector to all processors so
> that everybody can do the same calculatio
Should I copy-paste code from NumericVector to build mine?
Any suggestion?
Another alternative is to sync the solution vector to all processors so
that everybody can do the same calculation.
Seems a little inefficient, but is simple-and-easy.
rgds,
Renato
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 8:21 PM, John Pe
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Renato Poli wrote:
> Nice. It is important to identify the source of that value (elem. number,
> for example).
> Is it safe to use the template parameter as a custom class overriding
> the sorting operators?
>
> Something like:
>
> class MyClass {
> double nu
Nice. It is important to identify the source of that value (elem. number,
for example).
Is it safe to use the template parameter as a custom class overriding
the sorting operators?
Something like:
class MyClass {
double number_to_classify;
unsigned int elem_id;
operator< ( ... ) { ..
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Renato Poli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to evaluate the "greatest" value of a vector that is created in
> parallel. It is a matter of iterating over all the local elements and
> calculate the parts of this distributed vector.
>
> What is the best way to syncronize thi
17 matches
Mail list logo
