Re: [Libreoffice] comment translation

2010-10-15 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:55 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > > I think I will focus my efforts around the Calc part, though it > might > > be a bit crowded there :) > > Heh :-) well, of course Kohei is on holiday, so - for now, it > is less > busy than it might be. Ah yes, I am indeed on v

Re: [Libreoffice] Newbie dev question: no "rawbuild" directory after git clone

2010-10-15 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hello Terrell, On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 20:07 -0400, Terrell Prude' Jr. wrote: > Anything I'm missing here? Try running bin/g pull -r which should create the rawbuild directory. BTW, are you looking to hack on LibreOffice? If so, what's your area of interest? Any particular things you want to w

[Libreoffice] Newbie dev question: no "rawbuild" directory after git clone

2010-10-15 Thread Terrell Prude' Jr.
Hello folks, I'm attempting to get a proper development environment to build LibreOffice. Pulled a clone of the git repository, and it looks like I have everything except for the loroot/rawbuild directory. Problem: looks like the rawbuild directory is needed for building LibreOffice. Here

Re: [Libreoffice] beta 2 in OfficeShots

2010-10-15 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Cor Nouws wrote: > Now the business. Someone was so nice to point me to this page: > http://www.officeshots.org/galleries/view/odf-plugfest-granada-2010 > > Looks as if something with beta3 and ODF is not fine... > Would be great if someone/people could check. > Hi Cor, appears that the media-ty

[Libreoffice] Make calls to unary_function and binary_function less ambiguous for VC++ 10

2010-10-15 Thread Jesús Corrius
Hi all, Those are more patches to fix the compilation of LO with Visual Studio 2010. Cheers, -- Jesús Corrius Document Foundation founding member Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius 0001-Make-calls-to-unary_function-and-binary_function-les.patch Description: Binary data 0001-Make-calls-to

[Libreoffice] [LibreOffice][PATCH] compiler warnings inftxt.hxx

2010-10-15 Thread Kenneth Venken
some "shadows a member of 'this'" and "unused parameter" warnings. i've added an underscore prefix to the parameters that shadowed the members. Are there any naming conventions i should know of? what is the correct way to handle the "unused parameter" warnings? In this case the whole function pr

Re: [Libreoffice] [LibreOffice][PATCH] Fixes Compiler Warning

2010-10-15 Thread Kenneth Venken
Jan Holesovsky schreef op vr 15-10-2010 om 22:18 [+0200]: > Hi Kenneth, > > On 2010-10-15 at 21:10 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote: > > > Fixes a compiler warning: "suggest parentheses around && within || " > > I also improved the readability of the code a bit. > > The change you did silents the war

[Libreoffice] install structure (was Re: LO: Linux distro specific packages vs. universal build)

2010-10-15 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Petr, all, Petr Mladek wrote (15-10-10 20:20) You are right. We have already removed the 3-layer structure, so the version is not longer needed. I am going to remove the it. Now that I see this: is there any info on this (which I might have missed) or is it just: look at the installation

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice config migration

2010-10-15 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Michael, Michael Meeks wrote (15-10-10 17:21) So - here is my suggestion ;-) hopefully it annoys everybody, and it is two-fold. 1. we trawl for broken configuration settings in the code, and work to harden the code against bad configurations so it at l

Re: [Libreoffice] [LibreOffice][PATCH] Fixes Compiler Warning

2010-10-15 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Kenneth, On 2010-10-15 at 21:10 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote: > Fixes a compiler warning: "suggest parentheses around && within || " > I also improved the readability of the code a bit. The change you did silents the warning by doing what the compiler would do; but is that really what was the

Re: [Libreoffice] Update Catalan Translation

2010-10-15 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Jesus, On 2010-10-14 at 15:20 +0200, Jesús Corrius wrote: > This patch updates the Catalan translation. Thank you - pushed! Regards, Kendy ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Enable testtool (and possibly other stuff) to run with LibO

2010-10-15 Thread Giuseppe Castagno
Hi all, the following patch should allow testtool to run with LibO. The first patch (0001-Correct) corrects a symlink created during installation, I tested it under universal LibO install (pull +r yesterday evening). What it does should be reviewed by packager, since I don't know what it

Re: [Libreoffice] User mailing list

2010-10-15 Thread Gérard Fargeot
Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 11:02 -0700, Gérard Fargeot wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Message for Dev. >> >> Please have a look at users list. >> http://the-document-foundation.969070.n3.nabble.com/OFFSET-function-don-t-works-tp1700974p1700974.html > > Thanks! Just filed a bug for t

[Libreoffice] [LibreOffice][PATCH] Fixes Compiler Warning

2010-10-15 Thread Kenneth Venken
Fixes a compiler warning: "suggest parentheses around && within || " I also improved the readability of the code a bit. diff --git a/cui/source/options/optgdlg.cxx b/cui/source/options/optgdlg.cxx index 1ef3e3d..41f470e 100644 --- a/cui/source/options/optgdlg.cxx +++ b/cui/source/options/optgdlg.cx

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] SAL_N_ELEMENTS changes for components

2010-10-15 Thread Kenneth Venken
Michael Meeks schreef op vr 15-10-2010 om 18:23 [+0100]: > Hi Kenneth, Hi Michael, > > On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 01:29 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote: > > this is my first patch for Libreoffice. > > contributed under the LGPLv3+ > > Welcome ! :-) many thanks for your work, it built nicely. What pi

Re: [Libreoffice] LO: Linux distro specific packages vs. universal build

2010-10-15 Thread Petr Mladek
Rene Engelhard píše v Čt 14. 10. 2010 v 16:48 +0200: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:45:57PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > 1. installation root path: > > > > + /opt/libreoffice3 - used by the universal linux build by > > default > > Well, I don't see why we

Re: [Libreoffice] LO: Linux distro specific packages vs. universal build

2010-10-15 Thread Petr Mladek
Fridrich Strba píše v Čt 14. 10. 2010 v 08:55 -0600: > On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > 2. user configuration: > > > > + ~/.libreoffice/3 - used by the universal linux build > > + ~/.libreoffice/3- - proposed alternative > >distro-specific path

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH 1/3] Translate German comments in ure/xml2cmp

2010-10-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Laurent, Many thanks for the three nice patches :-) just pushed them. All the best, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freede

Re: [Libreoffice] SAL_N_ELEMENTS fixes.

2010-10-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Joseph, On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 22:22 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote: > I build beta2 tonight and I found 2 files messing the #include sal/macros.h > to allow the macro to work. Sorry pardon, this was my fault for not testing a commit carefully enough last night. It should all be fixed in ma

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] SAL_N_ELEMENTS changes for components

2010-10-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Kenneth, On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 01:29 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote: > this is my first patch for Libreoffice. > contributed under the LGPLv3+ Welcome ! :-) many thanks for your work, it built nicely. What piece of LibreOffice most interests you for hacking on ? Just pushed it,

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice config migration

2010-10-15 Thread André Schnabel
Hi, Am 15.10.2010 17:21, schrieb Michael Meeks: So - here is my suggestion ;-) hopefully it annoys everybody, and it is two-fold. (no question on 1. - harden the code for migration) ... 2. we continue to do automatic config migration since this is a commonly desir

Re: [Libreoffice] LibO Beta2 Crashes when inserting a caption into a frame

2010-10-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 20:39 -0700, NoOp wrote: > Thanks Michael. Is there an easy method for a standard user like myself > to test this, or do I need to compile myself directly ? Sadly you'd need to compile. However - rest assured I tested the crash, isolated the code, did the f

Re: [Libreoffice] code cleanup 4

2010-10-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Jacopo, On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 22:02 +0200, Jacopo Nespolo wrote: > git diff attached. contributed under the LGPLv3+ Wonderful, thanks - seems to have been committed (albeit silently), Good stuff, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, i

[Libreoffice] properties of document and save button

2010-10-15 Thread James
What is the current milestone? I have: LibreOffice 3.3.0 OOO330m9 (Build:1) When the properties of an unchanged document are modified, the save button is not enabled. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedeskto

Re: [Libreoffice] Slowness on UNC path

2010-10-15 Thread Camille Moulin
[Sorry for the empty mail] On 14/10/2010 16:58, camille.mou...@free.fr wrote: > > - "camille moulin" a écrit : >> - "Michael Meeks" a écrit : [...] >>> - to attach a >>> debugger to soffice in this 20 second window >> I'll try to do that (never done that before, so it might take me a >>

Re: [Libreoffice] Improvement Ideas

2010-10-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Jeff, On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 11:45 -0400, Jeff Seibert wrote: > I am currently a junior physics major, and over the years I have > been required to preform multiply regression analysis for my lab > reports. Great you have all the skills needed to hack on LibreOffice :-) > I have

Re: [Libreoffice] Slowness on UNC path

2010-10-15 Thread Camille Moulin
On 14/10/2010 16:58, camille.mou...@free.fr wrote: > > - "camille moulin" a écrit : >> - "Michael Meeks" a écrit : > [...] >>> It would be just great (if you can reproduce this) >> I can reproduce this no problem > > Strangely, since I install windbg files now open normally, but clo

Re: [Libreoffice] C{,PP}FLAGS ignored in sal

2010-10-15 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 01:22:46PM +0200, David Tardon wrote: > There is ENVCFLAGS for flags to add to $CC and ENVCFLAGSCXX for flags > to add to $CXX . That's a very good tip, thank you. Why aren't the environment's CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS variables added automatically? Is there a similar LDFLAGS o

Re: [Libreoffice] Some questions about the difference between LO to go-oo.

2010-10-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Nadav, On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:00 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote: > Without the change name/website I don't notice any changes. Well - that's not really so, we have: * a different, flattened code-base + [ yes we have some legacy patches still but they

Re: [Libreoffice] comment translation

2010-10-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Rene, On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 22:42 +0200, René Kjellerup wrote: > I am happy to help out, for now I'll be roaming about the code for a > while see if there's something I can do. Cool ! :-) > I think I will focus my efforts around the Calc part, though it might > be a bit crowded there

Re: [Libreoffice] User mailing list

2010-10-15 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 11:02 -0700, Gérard Fargeot wrote: > Hi, > > Message for Dev. > > Please have a look at users list. > http://the-document-foundation.969070.n3.nabble.com/OFFSET-function-don-t-works-tp1700974p1700974.html Thanks! Just filed a bug for this: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show

[Libreoffice] Improvement Ideas

2010-10-15 Thread Jeff Seibert
Hello Everyone, I am currently a junior physics major, and over the years I have been required to preform multiply regression analysis for my lab reports. I have been forced to use Microsoft office on a computer at school to accomplish these analysis's. I feel that Libre Office could improve

[Libreoffice] deb not recognized as archive? (was: Re: wiki-site about Beta2)

2010-10-15 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi *, , Andreas Mantke wrote (13-10-10 21:30) http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Beta2 I started with a first hint about installation on Linux-RPM. Thnks :-) I don't see any hint for what I experience (trying to do parallel installation): $ tar -zxvf ../LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86_insta

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Filters - Remove unnecessary #ifdef PCH & comments

2010-10-15 Thread jgraeme
On 14 October 2010 11:03, Michael Meeks wrote: >        Wonderful - thanks :-) [ wonder why they were still there ] In 2004 only the #include "core_pch.hxx" was commented out (//auto strip) & then in 2006 these type of comments were bulk removed, forgetting the rest. Graeme _

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice config migration

2010-10-15 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, Soo - I'm trying to understand and summarize where we are, and the basic problems so we can make a good decision; here are some of them that I see: A. Config migration is not 100% reliable, sometimes it gives you a broken config; if you remove your config - but

Re: [Libreoffice] friendlier build errors ...

2010-10-15 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:57:49PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hopefully - git master now doesn't tell you to execute a command you > can't run ;-) when we get a build failure it should say something like > this: > > [snip] > Compiling: vcl/source/app/brand.cxx > /data/opt/OpenOffice/loffi

[Libreoffice] beta 2 in OfficeShots

2010-10-15 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi guys, People here in Brussels were happy to have me with some basic presentation about LibreOffice/TDF. Wish us good future, coop etc :-) Now the business. Someone was so nice to point me to this page: http://www.officeshots.org/galleries/view/odf-plugfest-granada-2010 Looks as if somethin

Re: [Libreoffice] Error Building, vcl segmentation fault

2010-10-15 Thread René Kjellerup
A slight correction, a bit of further searching and I found the correct linker option, namely ld's "rpath" Used to force the search path of the dynamic linking (from gcc: $ gcc -Wl,-rpath= ) On Oct 15, 2010 1:04 PM, "René Kjellerup" wrote: ___ Libre

Re: [Libreoffice] [LibreOffice][Patch] Replace ASSERT and DBG_ASSERT with OSL_ENSURE + some translations, comment removal

2010-10-15 Thread David Tardon
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:11:26AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 22:34 +0200, Jacek Wolszczak wrote: > > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Debug_Levels. > > > > Some additional questions. What should I replace DBG_ERROR with? > > Hmm, DBG_ERROR takes no condition,

Re: [Libreoffice] C{,PP}FLAGS ignored in sal

2010-10-15 Thread David Tardon
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:33:45AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 08:37 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 05:25:59PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: > > > I don't see my CFLAGS nor CPPFLAGS, which would make it find boost, in > > > the gcc arguments. > >

Re: [Libreoffice] Error Building, vcl segmentation fault

2010-10-15 Thread René Kjellerup
Hi, I read on the Linux game publishing blog something about forcing gcc to resolve of the link library location, unfortunate the blog is down for the time being. However looking at gcc manual, it could have been the -B option. Hope that it might help. The Best René _

[Libreoffice] Some questions about the difference between LO to go-oo.

2010-10-15 Thread Nadav Vinik
Hello Without the change name/website I don't notice any changes. Are there more full time developers? Are there more companies that donate developers for that? Are the releases of the LO depend on Oracle Open Office like LO? (since also LO is open office version with git of patch differences)