On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:55 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > I think I will focus my efforts around the Calc part, though it
> might
> > be a bit crowded there :)
>
> Heh :-) well, of course Kohei is on holiday, so - for now, it
> is less
> busy than it might be.
Ah yes, I am indeed on v
Hello Terrell,
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 20:07 -0400, Terrell Prude' Jr. wrote:
> Anything I'm missing here?
Try running
bin/g pull -r
which should create the rawbuild directory.
BTW, are you looking to hack on LibreOffice? If so, what's your area of
interest? Any particular things you want to w
Hello folks,
I'm attempting to get a proper development environment to build
LibreOffice. Pulled a clone of the git repository, and it looks like I
have everything except for the loroot/rawbuild directory. Problem:
looks like the rawbuild directory is needed for building LibreOffice.
Here
Cor Nouws wrote:
> Now the business. Someone was so nice to point me to this page:
> http://www.officeshots.org/galleries/view/odf-plugfest-granada-2010
>
> Looks as if something with beta3 and ODF is not fine...
> Would be great if someone/people could check.
>
Hi Cor,
appears that the media-ty
Hi all,
Those are more patches to fix the compilation of LO with Visual Studio 2010.
Cheers,
--
Jesús Corrius
Document Foundation founding member
Skype: jcorrius | Twitter: @jcorrius
0001-Make-calls-to-unary_function-and-binary_function-les.patch
Description: Binary data
0001-Make-calls-to
some "shadows a member of 'this'" and "unused parameter" warnings.
i've added an underscore prefix to the parameters that shadowed the
members. Are there any naming conventions i should know of?
what is the correct way to handle the "unused parameter" warnings?
In this case the whole function pr
Jan Holesovsky schreef op vr 15-10-2010 om 22:18 [+0200]:
> Hi Kenneth,
>
> On 2010-10-15 at 21:10 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote:
>
> > Fixes a compiler warning: "suggest parentheses around && within || "
> > I also improved the readability of the code a bit.
>
> The change you did silents the war
Hi Petr, all,
Petr Mladek wrote (15-10-10 20:20)
You are right. We have already removed the 3-layer structure, so the
version is not longer needed. I am going to remove the it.
Now that I see this: is there any info on this (which I might have
missed) or is it just: look at the installation
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (15-10-10 17:21)
So - here is my suggestion ;-) hopefully it annoys everybody, and it is
two-fold.
1. we trawl for broken configuration settings in the code,
and work to harden the code against bad configurations so
it at l
Hi Kenneth,
On 2010-10-15 at 21:10 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> Fixes a compiler warning: "suggest parentheses around && within || "
> I also improved the readability of the code a bit.
The change you did silents the warning by doing what the compiler would
do; but is that really what was the
Hi Jesus,
On 2010-10-14 at 15:20 +0200, Jesús Corrius wrote:
> This patch updates the Catalan translation.
Thank you - pushed!
Regards,
Kendy
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo
Hi all,
the following patch should allow testtool to run with LibO.
The first patch (0001-Correct) corrects a symlink created during
installation, I tested it under universal LibO install (pull +r
yesterday evening).
What it does should be reviewed by packager, since I don't know what it
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 11:02 -0700, Gérard Fargeot wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Message for Dev.
>>
>> Please have a look at users list.
>> http://the-document-foundation.969070.n3.nabble.com/OFFSET-function-don-t-works-tp1700974p1700974.html
>
> Thanks! Just filed a bug for t
Fixes a compiler warning: "suggest parentheses around && within || "
I also improved the readability of the code a bit.
diff --git a/cui/source/options/optgdlg.cxx b/cui/source/options/optgdlg.cxx
index 1ef3e3d..41f470e 100644
--- a/cui/source/options/optgdlg.cxx
+++ b/cui/source/options/optgdlg.cx
Michael Meeks schreef op vr 15-10-2010 om 18:23 [+0100]:
> Hi Kenneth,
Hi Michael,
>
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 01:29 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> > this is my first patch for Libreoffice.
> > contributed under the LGPLv3+
>
> Welcome ! :-) many thanks for your work, it built nicely. What pi
Rene Engelhard píše v Čt 14. 10. 2010 v 16:48 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:45:57PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > 1. installation root path:
> >
> > + /opt/libreoffice3 - used by the universal linux build by
> > default
>
> Well, I don't see why we
Fridrich Strba píše v Čt 14. 10. 2010 v 08:55 -0600:
> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > 2. user configuration:
> >
> > + ~/.libreoffice/3 - used by the universal linux build
> > + ~/.libreoffice/3- - proposed alternative
> >distro-specific path
Hi Laurent,
Many thanks for the three nice patches :-) just pushed them.
All the best,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freede
Hi Joseph,
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 22:22 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote:
> I build beta2 tonight and I found 2 files messing the #include sal/macros.h
> to allow the macro to work.
Sorry pardon, this was my fault for not testing a commit carefully
enough last night. It should all be fixed in ma
Hi Kenneth,
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 01:29 +0200, Kenneth Venken wrote:
> this is my first patch for Libreoffice.
> contributed under the LGPLv3+
Welcome ! :-) many thanks for your work, it built nicely. What piece of
LibreOffice most interests you for hacking on ?
Just pushed it,
Hi,
Am 15.10.2010 17:21, schrieb Michael Meeks:
So - here is my suggestion ;-) hopefully it annoys everybody, and it is
two-fold.
(no question on 1. - harden the code for migration)
...
2. we continue to do automatic config migration since this is
a commonly desir
Hi there,
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 20:39 -0700, NoOp wrote:
> Thanks Michael. Is there an easy method for a standard user like myself
> to test this, or do I need to compile myself directly ?
Sadly you'd need to compile. However - rest assured I tested the crash,
isolated the code, did the f
Hi Jacopo,
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 22:02 +0200, Jacopo Nespolo wrote:
> git diff attached. contributed under the LGPLv3+
Wonderful, thanks - seems to have been committed (albeit silently),
Good stuff,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, i
What is the current milestone?
I have:
LibreOffice 3.3.0
OOO330m9 (Build:1)
When the properties of an unchanged document are modified, the save
button is not enabled.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedeskto
[Sorry for the empty mail]
On 14/10/2010 16:58, camille.mou...@free.fr wrote:
>
> - "camille moulin" a écrit :
>> - "Michael Meeks" a écrit :
[...]
>>> - to attach a
>>> debugger to soffice in this 20 second window
>> I'll try to do that (never done that before, so it might take me a
>>
Hi Jeff,
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 11:45 -0400, Jeff Seibert wrote:
> I am currently a junior physics major, and over the years I have
> been required to preform multiply regression analysis for my lab
> reports.
Great you have all the skills needed to hack on LibreOffice :-)
> I have
On 14/10/2010 16:58, camille.mou...@free.fr wrote:
>
> - "camille moulin" a écrit :
>> - "Michael Meeks" a écrit :
> [...]
>>> It would be just great (if you can reproduce this)
>> I can reproduce this no problem
>
> Strangely, since I install windbg files now open normally, but clo
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 01:22:46PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> There is ENVCFLAGS for flags to add to $CC and ENVCFLAGSCXX for flags
> to add to $CXX .
That's a very good tip, thank you.
Why aren't the environment's CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS variables added
automatically?
Is there a similar LDFLAGS o
Hi Nadav,
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:00 +0200, Nadav Vinik wrote:
> Without the change name/website I don't notice any changes.
Well - that's not really so, we have:
* a different, flattened code-base
+ [ yes we have some legacy patches still but they
Hi Rene,
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 22:42 +0200, René Kjellerup wrote:
> I am happy to help out, for now I'll be roaming about the code for a
> while see if there's something I can do.
Cool ! :-)
> I think I will focus my efforts around the Calc part, though it might
> be a bit crowded there
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 11:02 -0700, Gérard Fargeot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Message for Dev.
>
> Please have a look at users list.
> http://the-document-foundation.969070.n3.nabble.com/OFFSET-function-don-t-works-tp1700974p1700974.html
Thanks! Just filed a bug for this:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show
Hello Everyone,
I am currently a junior physics major, and over the years I have been
required to preform multiply regression analysis for my lab reports. I have
been forced to use Microsoft office on a computer at school to accomplish
these analysis's. I feel that Libre Office could improve
Hi *,
,
Andreas Mantke wrote (13-10-10 21:30)
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Beta2
I started with a first hint about installation on Linux-RPM.
Thnks :-)
I don't see any hint for what I experience (trying to do parallel
installation):
$ tar -zxvf ../LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86_insta
On 14 October 2010 11:03, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Wonderful - thanks :-) [ wonder why they were still there ]
In 2004 only the #include "core_pch.hxx" was commented out (//auto
strip) & then in 2006 these type of comments were bulk removed,
forgetting the rest.
Graeme
_
Hi guys,
Soo - I'm trying to understand and summarize where we are, and the
basic problems so we can make a good decision; here are some of them
that I see:
A. Config migration is not 100% reliable, sometimes it gives you
a broken config; if you remove your config - but
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:57:49PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hopefully - git master now doesn't tell you to execute a command you
> can't run ;-) when we get a build failure it should say something like
> this:
>
> [snip]
> Compiling: vcl/source/app/brand.cxx
> /data/opt/OpenOffice/loffi
Hi guys,
People here in Brussels were happy to have me with some basic
presentation about LibreOffice/TDF. Wish us good future, coop etc :-)
Now the business. Someone was so nice to point me to this page:
http://www.officeshots.org/galleries/view/odf-plugfest-granada-2010
Looks as if somethin
A slight correction, a bit of further searching and I found the correct
linker option, namely ld's "rpath"
Used to force the search path of the dynamic linking
(from gcc: $ gcc -Wl,-rpath= )
On Oct 15, 2010 1:04 PM, "René Kjellerup" wrote:
___
Libre
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:11:26AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 22:34 +0200, Jacek Wolszczak wrote:
> > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Debug_Levels.
> >
> > Some additional questions. What should I replace DBG_ERROR with?
>
> Hmm, DBG_ERROR takes no condition,
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:33:45AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 08:37 +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 05:25:59PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > > I don't see my CFLAGS nor CPPFLAGS, which would make it find boost, in
> > > the gcc arguments.
> >
Hi,
I read on the Linux game publishing blog something about forcing gcc to
resolve of the link library location, unfortunate the blog is down for the
time being. However looking at gcc manual, it could have been the -B
option.
Hope that it might help.
The Best
René
_
Hello
Without the change name/website I don't notice any changes.
Are there more full time developers?
Are there more companies that donate developers for that?
Are the releases of the LO depend on Oracle Open Office like LO? (since also
LO is open office version with git of patch differences)
42 matches
Mail list logo
