[Libreoffice] do not find dateif() function

2011-01-10 Thread gaochangsong
Hi, I would like to use libreoffice instead of openoffice, today,i use dateif() function, but i can't the funciton. The dateif() function can be use in excel. can you help me? best regards cs.gao ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freede

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2011-01-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Michael Meeks changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|32929 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.fre

Re: [Libreoffice] segfault in libqa_unit.so test

2011-01-10 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 06:50 +0100, David Tardon wrote: > > - CPPUNITTESTER=$(AUGMENT_LIBRARY_PATH_LOCAL) $(GDBCPPUNITTRACE) > > $(SOLARBINDIR)/cppunittester > > + CPPUNITTESTER=$(AUGMENT_LIBRARY_PATH_LOCAL) $(GDBCPPUNITTRACE) gdb > > --args $(SOLARBINDIR)/cppunittester > Actually, no tweaking is ne

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2011-01-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Bug 31865 depends on bug 32435, which changed state. Bug 32435 Summary: MSI branding not locale sensitive https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32435 What|Old Value |New Value -

Re: [Libreoffice] Don't change the naming scheme for rc2 please - keep windows at *install*_all_lang.exe

2011-01-10 Thread Andras Timar
2010.12.23. 15:01 keltezéssel, Fridrich Strba írta: > Here are the languages of the multi installer for documentation > writers: > en-US,af,ar,as,be-BY,bn,bo,ca,cs,da,de,dz,el,en-GB,es,eu,fi,fr,gl,gu,he,hi,hr,hu,it,ja,ko,mr,nb,nl,nn,oc,om,or,pl,pt,pt-BR,ru,sh,si,sk,sl,sr,sv,ta,te,th,tr,ug,uk,uz,v

Re: [Libreoffice] do not find dateif() function

2011-01-10 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Gao, gaochangsong wrote (09-01-11 16:55) I would like to use libreoffice instead of openoffice, today,i use dateif() function, but i can't the funciton. The dateif() function can be use in excel. can you help me? If you mean the DateDif function (with "D"), then the function Days() in Ca

Re: [Libreoffice] Change executable/sh names

2011-01-10 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> The attached patch fixes the issue for me, I don't think there is a need to abbreviate "LibreOffice" as "loffice" in the registry key names. We shouldn't use too many names for our baby. Otherwise, I'd say please do commit (to master). --tml ___ L

Re: [Libreoffice] Splitting up source/header files for clarity

2011-01-10 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> - Is it best to make one file for each class, or keep them together > and make one funcdesc.cxx (containing four classes)? I'd say one file, funcdesc.cxx, corresponding to funcdesc.hxx. But that is just my personal opinion. > - Should the license header for the new file(s) be a copy of the > l

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [REWORKED][PUSHED] Standard-color-palette-updates

2011-01-10 Thread Petr Mladek
Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai píše v So 08. 01. 2011 v 15:28 +0100: > Hi All, > > Updated patch, > > Remove LibreOffice colors from standard, and updates libreoffice.soc > with latest colors. I hope it is fine for us. looked fine => pushed Note that the palette name does not include year. Is it OK? Be

Re: [Libreoffice] Quasi-patch: Cursor vs Scroll

2011-01-10 Thread Maximilian Odendahl
Hi, > max, do you remember the code in the postits that the attached patch > affects, can you remember what the problem was that needed fixing ? no, I don't remember why this is needed, but I don't think this is the right patch for two reasons: - it is a regression from 3.2.1, where no change

Re: [Libreoffice] Change executable/sh names

2011-01-10 Thread Jesús Corrius
Hi Tor, >> The attached patch fixes the issue for me, > > I don't think there is a need to abbreviate "LibreOffice" as "loffice" in the > registry key names. We shouldn't use too many names for our baby. > > Otherwise, I'd say please do commit (to master). The problem is that we are using the sa

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Minor translations of comments for 3 files in writer/sw/inc

2011-01-10 Thread Christoph Herzog
From 10cf32601e9a3fb9211ec0aa0dcb45df91200fbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Herzog Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:26:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Minor translations of comments for 3 files in writer/sw/inc More to come... --- sw/inc/IDocumentFieldsAccess.hxx |3 +-- sw/inc/SwAppletImpl.

[Libreoffice] [Bug 31865] [Task]: LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers

2011-01-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31865 Bug 31865 depends on bug 32052, which changed state. Bug 32052 Summary: hat, vector and tilde doesn't appear https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32052 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] 3 more translations in writer/sw/inc

2011-01-10 Thread Christoph Herzog
From 49af73d83d4fe46f4ce106ee38733fc5c693a503 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Herzog Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:49:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] 3 more translations in writer/sw/inc --- sw/inc/dbfld.hxx| 46 -- sw/inc/dbmgr.hxx| 49 +++

Re: [Libreoffice] Change executable/sh names

2011-01-10 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Jesús Corrius wrote: > 3. Use a completely different windows registry keys for LibO. > That's the right approach in my book. And, if you, or somebody else is volunteering to do that - it would be really great to have those name instances consolidated to some $PRODUCTNAME placeholder or somesuch ..

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Translations sw/inc: crsrsh.hxx, cshtyp.hxx

2011-01-10 Thread Christoph Herzog
From b1a0d7dbe05057229cd06ad996a5375ee948166b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Herzog Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:04:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Translations sw/inc: crsrsh.hxx, cshtyp.hxx --- sw/inc/crsrsh.hxx | 94 ++--- sw/inc/cshtyp.hx

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Changed String to OUString in funcdesc.hxx

2011-01-10 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 21:41 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 20:37 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote: > > And here another patch for sc/inc/funcdesc.hxx and related source > > files, > ... > >(using casts when forced to use String originally because of ResId). > > Kohei will probab

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] some changes for better performance, writer.

2011-01-10 Thread Kayo Hamid
Hey, Anyway, do not let me discourage you :) May I suggest that you look at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks ? There should be enough interesting things to try there. D. replying it helps me, I know a bit more now about what I tried to do and it's a good feeling, of cou

Re: [Libreoffice] Change executable/sh names

2011-01-10 Thread Jesús Corrius
Hi Thorsten, 2011/1/10 Thorsten Behrens : > Jesús Corrius wrote: >> 3. Use a completely different windows registry keys for LibO. >> > That's the right approach in my book. And, if you, or somebody else > is volunteering to do that - it would be really great to have those > name instances consolid

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] remove dead codes never passed through even in case of MACOSX

2011-01-10 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 17:21 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Hi, > > Still loitering on EasyHack 3.7, I encountered dead codes as attached. > They seems safely removable because if -psn given, the call of > InterpretCommandLineParameter() will catch it and return sal_True, so > the lines in question wi

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] De-Java-ise flat XML export

2011-01-10 Thread Peter Jentsch
Hi Jan, Hi Gioele, I'm sending two more patches which aim to replace the xslt based flat xml filter implementation by a different one directly interfacing with the xml filter framework. It's actually simply copied from the ODK example and only slightly modified. It currently still lacks support f

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Changed String to OUString in funcdesc.hxx

2011-01-10 Thread Soeren Moeller
I have now added a function ResId::toString which returns an OUString from a ResId to tools/inc/resid.hxx, and changed the old workaround to use this function. I also have changed OUString to OUStringBuffer in getSignature() and GetParamList(), and modified the operations in these functions accordi

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [REWORKED][PUSHED] Standard-color-palette-updates

2011-01-10 Thread Bernhard Dippold
Hi Petr, Kami, all, Petr Mladek schrieb: Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai píše v So 08. 01. 2011 v 15:28 +0100: Hi All, Updated patch, Remove LibreOffice colors from standard, and updates libreoffice.soc with latest colors. I hope it is fine for us. looked fine => pushed Note that the palette name do

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove commented code

2011-01-10 Thread Anders Jonsson
This patch removes large comment blocks in libs-core. All code has been commented out at least since 2005. Anders Jonsson, (LGPLv3+,MPL) >From 847f9b8633181e4d666ef7094362cf598bbddaaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anders Jonsson Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:44:39 +0100 Subject: Remove commented cod

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Remove commented code

2011-01-10 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Anders Jonsson wrote: > This patch removes large comment blocks in libs-core. All code has been > commented out at least since 2005. Thanks, Pushed. Norbert > > Anders Jonsson, > (LGPLv3+,MPL) > > ___ > LibreOffice mai

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Changed String to OUString in funcdesc.hxx

2011-01-10 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 00:30 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote: > I have now added a function ResId::toString which returns an OUString > from a ResId to tools/inc/resid.hxx, and changed the old workaround to > use this function. I also have changed OUString to OUStringBuffer in > getSignature() and GetPa

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Changed String to OUString in funcdesc.hxx

2011-01-10 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 20:38 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Hmm... I tried apply your two patches against sc, but they don't > apply cleanly in global.cxx. I took a closer look, and looks like the > patches are missing some changes you've apparently made. Can you > double-check your patches and se

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Changed String to OUString in funcdesc.hxx

2011-01-10 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 21:08 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 20:38 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > Hmm... I tried apply your two patches against sc, but they don't > > apply cleanly in global.cxx. I took a closer look, and looks like the > > patches are missing some changes you

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Changed String to OUString in funcdesc.hxx

2011-01-10 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Forgot to use a [PUSHED] tag in the subject... :-P -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Changed String to OUString in ScFuncDesc

2011-01-10 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 18:24 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote: > Hi > > Please review and apply if appropriate this patch: > I have replaced four public (deprecated) String variables of > ScFuncDesc in sc/inc/funcdesc.hxx by OUString and changed all uses of > these variables to use OUString instead. Mos