קבלתי בתודה את פרסומכם
אודה לקבלת פרטים נוספים
היכן ניתן לראות את הפרסומים שלכם .
חגי
054-9090423
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi there,
I just merged the feature/dp-named-range-source branch into master.
With this merge, you can now use a named range to specify the data
source of a data pilot table. The name of the range can be entered into
the 'Selection From' field where you normally enter the data source
range. (You
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 6:59 PM, David Dumaresq wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to get started contributing to libreoffice by setting up my
> Mac. I'm following the steps to prepare my system for dependencies and I'm
> using this document:
>
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Insta
Hi Christoph. Thanks for the comments. I'll do my best to address them
one by one.
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:40:26 -0800, Christoph Noack
wrote:
First, thanks for the in-depth analysis and the patches, but I am not
that convinced that this will work as expected - at least the naming is
consistent
Title: Szalai Kálmán
Hi!
It seems we ship makefile.mk
in
libreoffice/basis3.3/share/template/layout
That is not necessary.
KAMI
2011-01-21 17:26 keltezéssel, Michael Meeks írta:
Hi guys,
So - I re-ran the analysis on RC4 which is
Hi, I'm trying to get started contributing to libreoffice by setting up my Mac.
I'm following the steps to prepare my system for dependencies and I'm using
this document:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Install_Mac_OS_10.6.4_Dependencies
I'm getting make errors about hal
Hi Octavio!
First, thanks for the in-depth analysis and the patches, but I am not
that convinced that this will work as expected - at least the naming is
consistent behavior across the suite.
My rationale ...
"Default Formatting" does not only reset the direct / hard formatting,
but also applied
Hi.
The purpose of the following set of patches is to rename "Default
Formatting" to "Clear Default Formatting" across all the suite. The goal
is to clarify what this function currently does and should do. The current
situation is that everybody has its own interpretation of this, mainly
because
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 22:05 +0100, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> It is funny. I run all release builds of libreoffice in a substed drive.
> I don't get dmake 127 errors though. The only errors I get time to time
> is dmake 126 error typically when processing xml (xcu) files. If you can
> debug dmake and
It is funny. I run all release builds of libreoffice in a substed drive.
I don't get dmake 127 errors though. The only errors I get time to time
is dmake 126 error typically when processing xml (xcu) files. If you can
debug dmake and find where your problem actually is, I would be a happy
man.
Che
Building on Windows is not easy as on Linux
Due to sometimes longe paths I used subst to create new drives directly
pointing to the libo source directory.
For the first Beta it did work.
After a break I had to get used to the new warper (g instead of bin/g).
And got a lot of errors. (dmake 127?) i
Hi,
first, I am sorry that I committed the older proposed fix and caused
Bernhard troubles. Unfortunately, the problem went somehow out of my
radar until I saw Bernhard's bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33230
Gökçen Eraslan píše v Po 10. 01. 2011 v 10:16 +:
> Perşembe 06 Oca
(Yes, there are still people using that, go figure.)
Could somebody please ACK these two commits for backport? Thanks.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=b13f9e3374f8f605e6bf6f7be8819142060c37e9
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=b799041d66f5f
Hello,
I want to apply the attached bootstrap patch. It disables the very
interesting feature of creating unusable binaries when one gets unlucky.
From 'man ld':
--noinhibit-exec
Retain the executable output file whenever it is still usable. Normally, the
linker will not produce an output
Hi there,
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 15:59 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Attached please find my amended patch for the removal of extra white
> space lines in
Amending the patch is not a great idea when the previous version is
committed :-)
> MMeeks let me know how this looks if its good
Hi there,
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 08:34 -0800, plino wrote:
> This might not be a Dev problem but since it's still related to the Windows
> installer...
Nice :-)
> The text on the first screen says in Portuguese something like "Sun
> Microsystems thanks you for downloading LibreOffice 3.3
Hi all,
Yesterday I have uploaded the wikihelp translations to
http://help.libreoffice.org , so far for the following languages:
en, ca, cs, de, es, fr, hu, it, ja, pt, pt-BR, ru, sl, vi
Please let me know if your language's help is translated, and you want
to see it in wikihelp :-)
>From now
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 13:52 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> New method: isEmpty() - Checks if a string is empty.
I like it.
There are lots of use-cases that we need to get into sal: that we sadly
don't have at the moment: to make writing code easier and less
error-prone
This might not be a Dev problem but since it's still related to the Windows
installer...
The RC4 installer correctly identified my location (once) and modified the
installer language accordingly (I would prefer to choose it myself even if
the installer provides a suggestion)
The text on the fir
It looks like this wasn't removed from some of the test code in
bootstrap/automation/util. I need to go to work and wont be back home until
late Saturday so, so I don't have time to fix. Just wanted to give someone a
heads up. I tried "rm -rf unmacxi.pro" in the automations directory but that
d
Hi guys,
So - I re-ran the analysis on RC4 which is here:
http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/sizes3.ods (2.2Mb)
Apart from a minor cockup (leaving tons of themes in there - when we
only really want tango + hicontrast) - the next major source of bloat is
code, and the u
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:40 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> Would this patch help?
Ah yes, another dangling reference to the long removed right-arrow
trick. Pushed, thanks for this. I had found and fixed another like this
some time ago.
There's still a pending patch in this thread IIRC. So what I
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 11:01 +, Noel Power wrote:
> On 21/01/11 06:59, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 04:58:28PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:18 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> >>> (...) we have to make these three places
> >>> agree. As t
On 01/21/2011 12:16 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 03:39 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
Attached you will find my first (but not last ;-) ) two patches.
Great ! :-) good to have you on board.
I wrote a Perl script to recursively search repos for "suspicious"
Attached please find my amended patch for the removal of extra white
space lines in
filter/source/xmlfilteradaptor/genericfilter.cxx
MMeeks let me know how this looks if its good feel free to push
>From 744c48dd358a743118ba8cb1bf2162ca7d243df3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jonathan aquilina
D
Thanks for clarifying that, Kevin.
I still prefer a good ol' forum any day :)
I agree with you that devs should not waste time with forums. But on the
other hand, even an ignorant like me ;) who can't write a like of code,
could contribute on such site as a Moderator or a Forum Helper...
Cheers
At 5:49am -0500 Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
Anyhow - if there is a lag, the solution to mail delivery problems is
not (IMHO) forcing everyone to use yet-another awful web forum thing :-)
FWIW, I 100% agree. This list archives all emails already, so they're
already easily Googleable
At 6:22am -0500 Fri, 21 Jan 2011, Plino wrote:
I did receive the email by Tor at the time. But I checked the Nabble
site and my message was listed as pending until 1 AM, i.e 12 hours
later... (and I have subscribed to this mailing list)
No, your message came through the list to me just over 30
On 01/21/2011 03:08 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 14:54 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
>> won't do this without your approval.
>
> Looks fine to me - no point in duplicating license headers.
>
> Michael K was writing a nice lint tool, that may be able
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 12:48 +, Noel Power wrote:
> Hmm missed this message in the email forest. Interesting, do you have
> more info on that? it seems lately I have stumbled into this code by
> accident a couple of time, if you have a bug # I might look further then
> next time.
http://qa.
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 14:54 +0100, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> won't do this without your approval.
Looks fine to me - no point in duplicating license headers.
Michael K was writing a nice lint tool, that may be able to find if
this problem (duplicated license headers) aff
Hi folks,
won't do this without your approval.
-Thomas
>From cb55cc9090a98014631949d769263e09152cfa5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Arnhold
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:52:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove old copyright notice.
All other files in this dir look the same. So I assume this as
Hi Christoph,
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 23:39 +0100, Christoph Herzog wrote:
> Sending the patch attached to this mail. I was not aware that I did not
> sent it as an attachment in my previous post. I thought I did but
> obviously something went wrong.
Hey :-) easily done.
Looks lo
Hi folks,
what do you think about this idea:
New method: isEmpty() - Checks if a string is empty.
This could simplify logics in the source. Now this test is done
like 'if (aStr.getLength() != 0) {...}' or 'if (!aStr.getLength()) {...}'.
With isEmpty() this looks like:
if (aStr.isEmpty()) {...}
On 14/01/11 12:17, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 12:25 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 06:17 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
is available for cherrypick/signoff
It looks fine to me.
Merged to libreoffice-3-3 and libreoffice-3-3-0, and re-working in
mast
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:39:07AM +0100, David Tardon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 08:25:40AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> FYI, the OpenOffice.org side fixed this in a way that seems more
>> robust to eventual future changes; you might want to push that way
>> into at least master (IMH
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 20:27 +0100, Bircher Florian wrote:
> Seems like M.Meeks did make some changes and PUSHED it to master:
> "cope with change of path, and broken absolute links this generates"
> SHA1 ID: 52dc7cfbcdd2b71d789ec1068bebcde44235dcdc
:-) Hope I didn't break anything too bad
Hi Michael
I did receive the email by Tor at the time. But I checked the Nabble site
and my message was listed as pending until 1 AM, i.e 12 hours later... (and
I have subscribed to this mailing list)
This is the first time I'm using a mailing list that converts to a Forum
and honestly I hate it
> Anyhow - if there is a lag, the solution to mail delivery problems is
> not (IMHO) forcing everyone to use yet-another awful web forum thing :-)
Agree 100%.
> it would be wonderful if you could have a dig into the setup_native/ code,
> and/or the solenv/bin/make_installer.pl MSI creation to see
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 03:39 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> Attached you will find my first (but not last ;-) ) two patches.
Great ! :-) good to have you on board.
> I wrote a Perl script to recursively search repos for "suspicious"
> files. (Files with a lot of "empty line, co
Hi Julien,
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 08:18 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> After a make, make dev-install. If I found a problem with LO, can I just
> do this :
> - source Linux...
> - go to the module I suppose there's the pb
> - make the change
> - build && deliver
'deliver' should not be nece
On 21/01/11 06:59, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 04:58:28PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:18 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
(...) we have to make these three places
agree. As to whether it is in the direction of "C/C++ long" everywhere
or in the di
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 17:32 -0800, plino wrote:
> Wow. It took 12 hours for my post to show up... I'm really looking
> forward to a real Forum...
It did ? can you substantiate that ? I read your post in the morning,
and Tor (after doing some real research & work on it) replied only three
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 08:18:45AM +0100, Julien Nabet wrote:
> I try to debug the problem of the Alt key for Linux (when Alt key is
> released, it opens the file menu)
> I think (I'm not sure) the problem is in vcl in the unx part (since
> it impacts only Linux not Windows and I don't know for Mac
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 08:25:40AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 08:00:05PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 05:59 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> >> Does not fit release blocker criteria, but would still be *very* nice
> >> to have for the rel
> I would like to cherry-pick the following from master to
> libreoffice-3-3.
Looks fine to me, approved.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
46 matches
Mail list logo
