Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Wayland support

* Alexander Thurgood schrieb: > The distros are choosing whether to include Wayland as a default > replacement for X - as far as I understand, Mark Shuttleworth has > allegedly indicated that he would like Wayland to appear in Ubuntu > sometime in 2012, possibly even earlier. Food for thought at

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove unused SalFontStructList

The attached patch removes the declaration of SalFontStructList because it is completely unused. (Verified via ./g grep) This patch, like all other patches for LibreOffice from me (unless otherwise noted) is licensed under both the LGPLv3+ and the MPL. -- Jonathan Callen From 58f20b8a4420dc6dda26

Re: [Libreoffice] A file to show 8192 discontinuities crashes Calc

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 19:10 -0800, r_ouellette wrote: > Well, no luck :-( > > I checked with LO 3.3 final version (RC4) and the problem remains... It is a > regression from previous OpenOffice.org (before LO) where the file was > correctly calculated. You need to wait until 3.4 for the correct fi

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Replaced tools/list with std::vector in funcdesc.hxx / funcdesc.cxx

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 22:14 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote: > Yet another patch, removing use of tools/list from ScFunctionList, > too. In this class there should be a clear performance gain, by using > a vector instead of a list, as our tests revealed that the random > access Get() function is called

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Replaced tools/list with std::vector in funcdesc.hxx / funcdesc.cxx

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 19:57 +0100, Soeren Moeller wrote: > Hi > > In the attached patches (0001 is the real patch, 0002 contains three > comments missing in 0001) we have replaced use of tools/list by use of > std::vector in ScFunctionMgr and ScFunctionCategory (in > sc/inc/funcdesc.hxx and sc/sou

Re: [Libreoffice] A file to show 8192 discontinuities crashes Calc

Well, no luck :-( I checked with LO 3.3 final version (RC4) and the problem remains... It is a regression from previous OpenOffice.org (before LO) where the file was correctly calculated. Raymond -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/A-file-to-show-8192-disconti

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Easy hacks: remove double line spacing

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > On 1/28/11 11:23 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 22:46 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I removed the double line spacings in one file. Hope the resulting style >>> is ok. If so, I'll continue  :-

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] cleanup on impress

Hi Michael, Thank you for pushing it. On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:05:46 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 19:12 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: >> Another cleanup on impress. > > Thanks for those, they're great - pushed both of them :-) [ IU assume > under LGPLv3+/MPL ;-] Yes, all

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hacks: remove double line spacing

On 1/29/11 12:28 AM, Guillaume wrote: Hi, I removed some empty lines in few files for my first patch. I'll continue if it's ok. Regards Guillaume ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/list

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Easy hacks: remove double line spacing

On 1/28/11 11:23 PM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 22:46 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: Hi, I removed the double line spacings in one file. Hope the resulting style is ok. If so, I'll continue :-) Easy one. :-) Pushed. What file as its something i'm already working on with

Re: [Libreoffice] Missing vcl resource. This indicates that files vital to localization are missing. You might have a corrupt installation.

On 2011-01-28, at 12:03 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 09:59 -0800, David Dumaresq wrote: >> On 2011-01-28, at 4:02 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: >>> ls -asl starmath/unx*.pro/bin > >> libo dfdumaresq$ ls -asl starmath/unx*.pro/bin >> total 240 >> 0 drwxr-xr-x 12 dfdumaresq

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hacks: remove double line spacing

Hi, I removed some empty lines in few files for my first patch. I'll continue if it's ok. Regards Guillaume >From b4a7a9c01d535e6e0ab0c8324458494bcd757409 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillaume Fillol Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:14:19 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Easy hacks: remove double line spacing

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] Easy hacks: remove double line spacing

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 22:46 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > Hi, > > I removed the double line spacings in one file. Hope the resulting style > is ok. If so, I'll continue :-) Easy one. :-) Pushed. -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc __

Re: [Libreoffice] Reworking build.pl: What to do with the "--html" and "--interactive" parameters

Hi Michael, *, On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:29 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> No, please don't --html in combination with --dontgraboutput is >> usefull for parallel builds to have the output not interwoven. >> (or add that feature with o

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Easy hacks: remove double line spacing

Hi, I removed the double line spacings in one file. Hope the resulting style is ok. If so, I'll continue :-) Christina >From c89eb7f1d41ac551615c33b27c433223a3b04e38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christina Rossmanith Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:42:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Easy hacks: remove

Re: [Libreoffice] SCID_NEWDOCUMENT

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 22:35 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > Hi Nigel, > > thank you for your hint. Now I've found a file in filters where the > constant is referenced (and a lot of dead code too :-) ). Yup, it's still referenced; however, binfilter also has its own definition of SCID_NEWD

[Libreoffice] SCID_NEWDOCUMENT

Hi Nigel, thank you for your hint. Now I've found a file in filters where the constant is referenced (and a lot of dead code too :-) ). Christina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/l

Re: [Libreoffice] SCID_NEWDOCUMENT

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 21:59 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > I'm still translating comments and came across a constant named > SCID_NEWDOCUMENT. When I asked opengrok the only place where this > constant was found was the file rechead.hxx itself. Does that mean > that the constant can be removed

[Libreoffice] SCID_NEWDOCUMENT

Hi Kohei, and how could I find out if a constant like SCID_NEWDOCUMENT is still referenced? Or does that require some more experience with the code base? Christina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedeskto

Re: [Libreoffice] SCID_NEWDOCUMENT

Hi Christina, On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 21:59 +0100, Christina Roßmanith wrote: > Hi, > > I'm still translating comments and came across a constant named > SCID_NEWDOCUMENT. When I asked opengrok the only place where this > constant was found was the file rechead.hxx itself. Does that mean > that the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Replaced tools/list with std::vector in funcdesc.hxx / funcdesc.cxx

Yet another patch, removing use of tools/list from ScFunctionList, too. In this class there should be a clear performance gain, by using a vector instead of a list, as our tests revealed that the random access Get() function is called 2-3000 times for each use of a spreadsheet function. Note that w

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Replaced tools/list with std::vector in funcdesc.hxx / funcdesc.cxx

Hi, I confirm that this patch and future patches are under LGPLv3+/MPL Regards, Thies Pierdola ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] SCID_NEWDOCUMENT

Hi, I'm still translating comments and came across a constant named SCID_NEWDOCUMENT. When I asked opengrok the only place where this constant was found was the file rechead.hxx itself. Does that mean that the constant can be removed (a

Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office)

On 28/01/11 14:39, Thorsten Guenther wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Am 28.01.2011 14:58, schrieb Michael Meeks: >> >> Almost certainly you want to get involved with the existing odf toolkit >> project: http://odftoolkit.org/ they have a new Java API that does this >> - though not using LibreOffice.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] GTK: remove menu when we press the alt key

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 16:50 +0100, xapantu wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a patch to remove the menu when the alt key is pressed, it is > not the case with GTK apps, and is disturbing. This will also work around the rather horrific hack that totem (and probably other things have), where when it doesn'

Re: [Libreoffice] Missing vcl resource. This indicates that files vital to localization are missing. You might have a corrupt installation.

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 09:59 -0800, David Dumaresq wrote: > On 2011-01-28, at 4:02 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > ls -asl starmath/unx*.pro/bin > libo dfdumaresq$ ls -asl starmath/unx*.pro/bin > total 240 > 0 drwxr-xr-x 12 dfdumaresq staff408 27 Jan 20:09 . > 0 drwxr-xr-x 12 dfdumaresq

Re: [Libreoffice] Import user settings, basic libs not correctly imported

Hi Michael, Michael Meeks wrote (28-01-11 17:29) On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 11:55 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: Now when starting rc1 again, it gives error messages about not found basic libraries. I wonder - did we get these fixed ? you mentioned you filed the bug, but not the number ;-) Se

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] GTK: remove menu when we press the alt key

Hi, Le vendredi 28 janvier 2011 à 17:16 +, Michael Meeks a écrit : > Hi there, > > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 16:50 +0100, xapantu wrote: > > Here is a patch to remove the menu when the alt key is pressed, it is > > not the case with GTK apps, and is disturbing. And the code to show the > > menu w

[Libreoffice] OT: make enums more typesafe

Hi folks, OT, but perhaps somebody might know an answer: is there a way (w/ recent gcc) make forbid the compile fail when enums and ints get mixed up (eg. numeric operations or assignments from/to int) ? thx -- -- Enrico We

Re: [Libreoffice] Patches by two persons?

Thank you for your answers, for now we will alternate the author in the git patch files, but I will mostly send the mails to this mailing list. (And we now both have send a mail, confirming that all our patches are LGPLv3+/MPL) Best regards Sören 2011/1/28 Norbert Thiebaud : > On Fri, Jan 28, 201

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Replaced tools/list with std::vector in funcdesc.hxx / funcdesc.cxx

Hi In the attached patches (0001 is the real patch, 0002 contains three comments missing in 0001) we have replaced use of tools/list by use of std::vector in ScFunctionMgr and ScFunctionCategory (in sc/inc/funcdesc.hxx and sc/source/core/funcdesc.cxx). We choose vector, as there is done random acc

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] EasyHacks 4.13 - get rid of macros from svarray.hxx

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 17:03 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:50 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > Here, you've changed the semantics of the code. I've fixed that to > > push_back(nTab+i) which is probably what we need to do here. > > Sorry. My bad. Not a problem. I eventuall

Re: [Libreoffice] revert incorrectl RTL_CONSTASCII_ usage ...

Yes, sorry for that ;) On 01/28/2011 06:03 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi there, > > I just had to revert: > > Replace suitable equalsAscii calls with equalsAsciiL. > > diff --git a/oox/source/ole/axbinaryreader.cxx > b/oox/source/ole/axbinaryreader.cxx > index 36cc2d7..105db2b 100644

[Libreoffice] simple app background gradients ...

Hi guys, On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 22:20 +0100, Christoph Noack wrote: > Am Samstag, den 08.01.2011, 02:05 +0100 schrieb Bernhard Dippold: > > > I was thinking of a nice background instead of a static colour. > > > You can find some of my design here > > > http://rahulprasad.com/public/libreOffice/wri

Re: [Libreoffice] trouble installing/running

Hi Chris, On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:33 -0500, Chris Morgan wrote: > I followed the instructions on > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/ but I don't > appears to have a bin/ooinstaller. I asked on irc last night and > someone said that was an old way to install, the current way was

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] GTK: remove menu when we press the alt key

Hi there, On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 16:50 +0100, xapantu wrote: > Here is a patch to remove the menu when the alt key is pressed, it is > not the case with GTK apps, and is disturbing. And the code to show the > menu wasn't at the right place, so, even if we should have this menu, it > is dirty IMO.

[Libreoffice] revert incorrectl RTL_CONSTASCII_ usage ...

Hi there, I just had to revert: Replace suitable equalsAscii calls with equalsAsciiL. diff --git a/oox/source/ole/axbinaryreader.cxx b/oox/source/ole/axbinaryreader.cxx index 36cc2d7..105db2b 100644 --- a/oox/source/ole/axbinaryreader.cxx +++ b/oox/source/ole/axbinaryreader.cxx @@ -

Re: [Libreoffice] Missing vcl resource. This indicates that files vital to localization are missing. You might have a corrupt installation.

On 2011-01-28, at 4:02 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 12:45 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:14:17PM -0800, David Dumaresq >> wrote: >>> Missing vcl resource. This indicates that files vital to localization are >>> missing. You might have a corrupt i

Re: [Libreoffice] Missing vcl resource. This indicates that files vital to localization are missing. You might have a corrupt installation.

On 2011-01-28, at 3:45 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:14:17PM -0800, David Dumaresq > wrote: >> Missing vcl resource. This indicates that files vital to localization are >> missing. You might have a corrupt installation. > > Can you post the contents of your autogen.lastr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] EasyHacks 4.13 - get rid of macros from svarray.hxx

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:50 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Here, you've changed the semantics of the code. I've fixed that to > push_back(nTab+i) which is probably what we need to do here. Sorry. My bad. > Your second patch is pretty small & reasonable. It should be okay as > the only other plac

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] EasyHacks 4.13 - get rid of macros from svarray.hxx

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:57 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > You don't need to remove all trailing whitespaces in those files you > modify, as that would create unnecessary hunks making it harder for us > to review your patches. I wasn't aware I had. I suspect my pesky editor is doing it behind my ba

Re: [Libreoffice] Import user settings, basic libs not correctly imported

Hi Cor, On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 11:55 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > Anyone here knows of a bug with migration of user settings to 330rc1? > When I first started 330rc1, if collected data from probably the Ubuntu > distributed OOo. :-) > Now when starting rc1 again, it gives error messages abo

[Libreoffice] web bits ...

Hi Christian, I just added a couple of new web easy hacks, and moved another into this section. Since you're the mastro of web hackery, I wanted to run them past you for a sanity check: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks#Web_improvements Thoughts ? :-) hope

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] EasyHacks 4.13 - get rid of macros from svarray.hxx

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:57 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Oh yeah, I almost forgot. ;-) And I forgot to put [PUSHED] to the subject line ;-) Perhaps I need more caffeine Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc ___ LibreOffice maili

Re: [Libreoffice] Run soffice -env:UserInstallation=$(URL) to get LO OSX Portable

On 28/gen/2011, at 15.34, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Perhaps you can try something like > file:///Users/gand/PortableLO/3 or something like that. You are right, this work fine: MacBook:~ gand$ /Applications/LibreOffice.app/Contents/MacOS/soffice -env:UserInstallation=file:///Users/gand/PortableLO/3

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] EasyHacks 4.13 - get rid of macros from svarray.hxx

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:50 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Thanks for your patches. Oh yeah, I almost forgot. ;-) You don't need to remove all trailing whitespaces in those files you modify, as that would create unnecessary hunks making it harder for us to review your patches. I thought that it

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] GTK: remove menu when we press the alt key

Hi, Here is a patch to remove the menu when the alt key is pressed, it is not the case with GTK apps, and is disturbing. And the code to show the menu wasn't at the right place, so, even if we should have this menu, it is dirty IMO. See this Launchpad bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sourc

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] EasyHacks 4.13 - get rid of macros from svarray.hxx

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 14:09 +, Nigel Hawkins wrote: > Hi, > > I've started looking at the easy hack for removing the macro-defined > "vectors" in svl/avarray. Chose an easy one to start with. First > attached patch removes all usage of SvShorts from sc (only place it was > used), and the secon

[Libreoffice] [Bug 32894] [Task] LibreOffice 3.3.1 release blockers / stoppers

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32894 --- Comment #13 from Michael Meeks 2011-01-28 07:48:28 PST --- perhaps 33655 too for Olivier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC lis

Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office)

Hi Ben, Am 28.01.2011 15:55, schrieb BRM: > > Why go through the effort of (i) scripting LO and (ii) enabling your > application > to do that, when you could simply > just make a UI to (a) show the existing document to the user in a view mode > (read-only), (b) get the specific data you need in

[Libreoffice] trouble installing/running

Hello. I followed the instructions on http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/ but I don't appears to have a bin/ooinstaller. I asked on irc last night and someone said that was an old way to install, the current way was via dev-install or dev-installer but I don't appear to have that e

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] cpp cleanliness: fixed some memleaks binfilter

Hi there, On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:55 +0100, Kenneth Venken wrote: > these patches remove some comments > from ./filters/binfilter/bf_svx/source/editeng/svx_editobj.cxx and I've pushed these two. > fixes two memleaks. But this third one looks more problematic to me (at least on

Re: [Libreoffice] Reworking build.pl: What to do with the "--html" and "--interactive" parameters

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:29 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > No, please don't --html in combination with --dontgraboutput is > usefull for parallel builds to have the output not interwoven. > (or add that feature with other means. So - the requirement is that we log each build's output

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:13 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote: > What about using GCC atomic builtins like in the attached patch? Lovely :-) I would use them exclusively, except for the fact that we got a substantial speed win on (lets face it, by now rather old single-processor Intel systems), w

Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office)

- Original Message > From: Thorsten Guenther > Hi Michael, > Am 28.01.2011 14:58, schrieb Michael Meeks: > > Almost certainly you want to get involved with the existing odf toolkit > > project: http://odftoolkit.org/ they have a new Java API that does this > > - though not using

Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office)

Hi Kohei, Am 28.01.2011 15:06, schrieb Kohei Yoshida: > > Someone else has tried something very similar there many years ago. > > http://sao.sourceforge.net/ > > The project may have been abandoned by now (sure looks like it), but > perhaps you can pick up his basic ideas or (license permitting) h

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

Hi Steve, On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 23:06 +1000, Steve Butler wrote: > Baby steps... this patch uses the idxdict program to build the idx files > instead > of the perl script. Great - it turns out we needed to use $(AUGMENT_LIBRARY_PATH) to make this work - essentially setting LD_LIBRARY_PAT

Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office)

Hi Michael, Am 28.01.2011 14:58, schrieb Michael Meeks: > > Almost certainly you want to get involved with the existing odf toolkit > project: http://odftoolkit.org/ they have a new Java API that does this > - though not using LibreOffice. > No, they created a stand alone lib. Great for runn

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] gtk toggle buttons (libs-gui)

Hi, 2011/1/28 Michael Meeks > Hi Lucas, [...] Any chance you can send patches as a git format-patch attachment ? in > future ( so I don't have to write the commit log message ? ). Just do > git commit -a (or --amend if you want to change it later), then git > format-patch HEAD~1 :-) > >

Re: [Libreoffice] Run soffice -env:UserInstallation=$(URL) to get LO OSX Portable

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:24 +0100, FreeSMGU wrote: > Here are my terminal commands but tall fails: > MacBook:~ gand$ /Applications/LibreOffice.app/Contents/MacOS/soffice > -env:UserInstallation=$(/Users/gand/PortableLO/3/) > -bash: /Users/gand/PortableLO/3/: is a directory > MacBook:~ gand$ /Appl

Re: [Libreoffice] Reworking build.pl: What to do with the "--html" and "--interactive" parameters

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 04:58 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: >> I analyzed the build.pl script to get rid of the "--server" parameter. >> While looking through the code I discovered two other parameters >> "--html" and "--interacti

[Libreoffice] Run soffice -env:UserInstallation=$(URL) to get LO OSX Portable

I'm trying to open LibreOffice with soffice -env:UserInstallation=$(URL) to set a custom user folder but get just icon bouncing in the dock and then closing, non errors in console. Here are my terminal commands but tall fails: MacBook:~ gand$ /Applications/LibreOffice.app/Contents/MacOS/soffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] EasyHacks 4.13 - get rid of macros from svarray.hxx

Hi, I've started looking at the easy hack for removing the macro-defined "vectors" in svl/avarray. Chose an easy one to start with. First attached patch removes all usage of SvShorts from sc (only place it was used), and the second removes the declaration of it from svl. Changes are LGPLv3+/MPL

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: Horizontal glyph adjustments are ignored with ICU layout

On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 17:03 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 11:22 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > Anybody here with ideas what we can do so that the patch helps Khaled, > > and is as safe as possible? - so that we can commit it, and fix the > > consequences later if anything

Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office)

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 14:46 +0100, Thorsten Guenther wrote: > I would like to provide a Java-API for remote controlling LO. That is > what can be done today with the UNO API. So the new API should be > implemented as wrapper, hiding as much UNO'isms as possible, > presumably > for the cost of reduc

Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office)

Hi Thorsten, On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 14:46 +0100, Thorsten Guenther wrote: > Well, sadly I dont know a thing about the technical issues embedding a > jvm in an c application. Perhaps some of the user experience (apart from > download size) could be solved by shipping a "private" JVM with LO, but >

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] gtk toggle buttons (libs-gui)

Hi Lucas, On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 21:00 +0100, xapantu wrote: > Here is a patch to fix gtk toggle buttons, and it cleans up the code a > little too. Great stuff :-) nice patch, and lovely rational: > and this page to check the standard details name: > https://webstats.gnome.org/GTK%2B/Them

Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office)

Am 28.01.2011 11:17, schrieb Michael Meeks: > >> could you please give me an idea why it would be useful to replace a >> language alien to the core with another alien ? > Well python is not alien, since we ship a tiny (~1.7Mb) python run-time > with every copy of LibreOffice we ship; ie. it i

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

On 28 January 2011 23:06, Steve Butler wrote: > Baby steps... this patch uses the idxdict program to build the idx files > instead > of the perl script. Sorry, II forgot to state the previous patch is LGPL/MPL licensed as requested. ___ LibreOffice mai

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

On 28 January 2011 20:29, Steve Butler wrote: > Hi Michael, > >> > I have no idea how this would be integrated into the build process as I'm >> > not even sure where it is called from, but happy if someone wants to >> > take up the challenge and/or incorporate it as an installer process. Baby ste

Re: [Libreoffice] adapting to a commit account ...

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: >> My git account is now created but I don't know what to do next to push >> my commit. > >        Heh - so what you want to do first is switch the trees to use your git > account: > >        g --rewrite-account > >        Then you should be a

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] ure: Some fixes to documentation (part 4)

Hi there, On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 11:20 +0200, Aurimas Fišeras wrote: > Fixes many spelling errors (checked with en_US spell checker). > Unifies spelling of some common words. :-) > Replaces single quotes ('') with double quotes (""). > Fixes several other errors. Really nice work

[Libreoffice] [PUSJED] ure: Some fixes to documentation (part 3)

It seems this was committed already :-) lovely work in there though; onto the next one :-) Thanks, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] cleanup on impress

Hi Takashi, On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 19:12 +0900, Takeshi Abe wrote: > Another cleanup on impress. Thanks for those, they're great - pushed both of them :-) [ IU assume under LGPLv3+/MPL ;-] All the best, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer

Re: [Libreoffice] Missing vcl resource. This indicates that files vital to localization are missing. You might have a corrupt installation.

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 12:45 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:14:17PM -0800, David Dumaresq > wrote: > > Missing vcl resource. This indicates that files vital to localization are > > missing. You might have a corrupt installation. > > Can you post the contents of your auto

[Libreoffice] adapting to a commit account ...

Hi Julien, Hopefully someone sorted you out; but if not here is how it goes: On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 22:24 +0100, Julien Nabet wrote: > Here is a patch for some cppcheck cleaning in basctl > Compiling was ok Great ;-) > My git account is now created but I don't know what to do nex

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Use product name for EPS Creator header

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 00:30 +0900, KUROSAWA, Takeshi wrote: > I've recently noticed the EPS export filter uses "Sun Microsystems, > Inc." for %%Creator header. > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33569 .. > Here is a patch to make the filter use product name for the header. > It's actua

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Parse 'color' property (fdo#33551)

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 00:54 +0900, KUROSAWA, Takeshi wrote: > Oops! I forgot to attach the patch. Heh :-) Thanks for that ! I've pushed it to master. Thorsten - if you're happy can you cherry-pick it for libreoffice-3-3 ? Thanks, Michael. -- michael.m

Re: [Libreoffice] Missing vcl resource. This indicates that files vital to localization are missing. You might have a corrupt installation.

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:14:17PM -0800, David Dumaresq wrote: > Missing vcl resource. This indicates that files vital to localization are > missing. You might have a corrupt installation. Can you post the contents of your autogen.lastrun file? pgpwX0gCWt4KP.pgp Description: PGP signature __

Re: [Libreoffice] Pagination extention not localized in LibreOffice

Hi there, On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 18:46 +0100, Łukasz Madurski wrote: > I wonder what's the problem with Pagination Extention in LibreOffice. Possibly, it is simply not translated; at least - I don't believe we bundle that extension right ? > It works fine, but after instalation there is

Re: [Libreoffice] MacOs Build failure in: unit test #2 on library ../../unxmacxi.pro/lib/libswdoctest.dylib

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 04:56 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > n_th@tpamac /Volumes/Raid0/tb/sw/unxmacxi.pro/bin $ll > total 24 > -rw--- 1 n_th staff 0 Jan 28 04:34 3BEtea > -rw--- 1 n_th staff 4025 Jan 28 04:34 EVSwKa > -rw--- 1 n_th staff 4025 Jan 28 03:56 ErfdWl > -rw--

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and (La)Tex

On 2011-01-27, Alexander wrote: > I want to suggest to add in LO support LaTeX as formulas generator. > Instead or jointly of Math. Yes, integral LaTeX support would be awesome! -- -John (j...@os2.dhs.org) ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@l

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED, partial] Re: [PATCH] removed bogus comments

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 04:08 +0900, Suguru Hirahara wrote: > Hello, > > other two patches are attached. There were just bogus comments removed. > (LGPLv3+ / MPL) So I pushed a good chunk of this, but not all, because while comments that indicate the date and author of a change are not really usefu

Re: [Libreoffice] MacOs Build failure in: unit test #2 on library ../../unxmacxi.pro/lib/libswdoctest.dylib

Hi Norbert, On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 04:56 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > So this has got to be something to do with STAR_RESOURCEPATH, that's > > supposed to set the location where the .res files exist in order to find > > them, but bodge the path. .. > and solver/330/unxmacxi.pro/bin contains a

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch] Accelerate Perl installer builder

Hi Jan, On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:51 +0100, Jan Darmochwal wrote: > At the moment I have no idea how the installer actually works. Lol :-) the perl is mangled enough that I suspect you can be productive like that just fine to start with. The basic idea is that make_installer is li

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 09:39 +0100, jo...@smidstrup.net wrote: > > Code cleanup in msfilter Because the attached patch is actually my last commit to "filters" I suspect that you either did something like git pull -r (which pulled down the last changes) git format-patch -1 and got the last change

Re: [Libreoffice] MacOs Build failure in: unit test #2 on library ../../unxmacxi.pro/lib/libswdoctest.dylib

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 03:59 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:21 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> ---

Re: [Libreoffice] Patch

Hi Jonas, On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 09:39 +0100, jo...@smidstrup.net wrote: > Code cleanup in msfilter Woah; so sorry - but it seems that Caolan fixed this up himself almost identically yesterday evening ! (drat). Perhaps it might be better to work with Pierre ripping code out of the

Re: [Libreoffice] RC4 / Windows size analysis ...

Hi Michael, On 28 January 2011 04:04, Michael Meeks wrote: > > >        Licensing wise - I'd like to add the standard LGPLv3+/MPL header to it > (see bootstrap/) but having MIT too is fine if you want. This patch adds the (c) header from the template to the idxdict.cpp although i had to tweak it

Re: [Libreoffice] configure: WARNING: Your gcc is not -fvisibility=hidden safe. Disabling visibility

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 03:43 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:20 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> > >> >> ld: warning: com::sun::star::uno::cpp_release(

Re: [Libreoffice] MacOs Build failure in: unit test #2 on library ../../unxmacxi.pro/lib/libswdoctest.dylib

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 03:59 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:21 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >> -- > >> - start unit test #2 on library ../../unxmacxi.pr

Re: [Libreoffice] configure: WARNING: Your gcc is not -fvisibility=hidden safe. Disabling visibility

On 1/28/11 11:21 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 03:43 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:20 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: ld: warning: com::sun::star::uno::cpp_release(void*)has different visibili

Re: [Libreoffice] configure: WARNING: Your gcc is not -fvisibility=hidden safe. Disabling visibility

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 03:43 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:20 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > > >> ld: warning: com::sun::star::uno::cpp_release(void*)has different > >> visibility (hidden) in ../../unxmacxi.

Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office)

Hi Thorsten, On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:48 +0100, Thorsten Guenther wrote: > Am 27.01.2011 11:48, schrieb Michael Meeks: > >> I wouldn't mind spear heading an effort to do a python port > >> of LO in regards to going web based. Cant you integrate the > >> C++ code we have with python? > > If you

Re: [Libreoffice] Installation instructions for source code release

Hi Francois, On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:27 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > Well, I may become a package maintainer in the future but for that I need > to be able to build LO from the released sources first. Sure ;-) so what I suggest you do is take a look at eg. Rene's debian packages, or C

Re: [Libreoffice] MacOs Build failure in: unit test #2 on library ../../unxmacxi.pro/lib/libswdoctest.dylib

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:21 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> -- >> - start unit test #2 on library ../../unxmacxi.pro/lib/libswdoctest.dylib >> ---

Re: [Libreoffice] Reworking build.pl: What to do with the "--html" and "--interactive" parameters

Hi Michael, On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 04:58 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > I analyzed the build.pl script to get rid of the "--server" parameter. > While looking through the code I discovered two other parameters > "--html" and "--interactive". Both generate a html page that should > show an updated pro

[Libreoffice] developer list etiquette

Hi Jonathan, So - wrt. your mail: Re: [Libreoffice] configure: WARNING: Your gcc is not -fvisibility=hidden safe. Disabling visibility No doubt others need to read this too; but here is some terrible netiquette that I'd prefer not to see repeated everywhere. We had seventy-six l

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and (La)Tex

Hi Alexander, On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 02:52 +0300, Alexander wrote: > I want to suggest to add in LO support LaTeX as formulas generator. > Instead or jointly of Math. .. > Currently, LO inherited old non-wide used StarOffice syntax for formulas. So - it is clear that the LaTeX syntax is we

Re: [Libreoffice] Patches by two persons?

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:02 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: >> Well, we may need to adapt the tools computing the stats and credits to >> take this into account. We will need to get all the names pretty easily >> from git to get everyone pro

  1   2   >