Re: [Libreoffice] when switch to libreoffice-3-3-2 branch, why the g script disappear

2011-03-29 Thread Samphan Raruenrom
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Is this perhaps on Windows? Anybody working on the source on Windows? > git has problems replacing files that are in use on Windows, so if a git > command attempts to replace the very g script that is being run, it will > fail silently, t

Re: [Libreoffice] Purpose of easy task 'Get rid of sal_uLong' ?

2011-03-29 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: [...] >and what should have been used instead would be some "gint64orlonger" type. > btw that already exist in stdint.h , although not very keystroke friendly: / 7.18.1.2 Minimum-width integer types int_least8_t; int_least16_t; int_least32_t;

[Libreoffice] How to edit gallery files?

2011-03-29 Thread Clio
Default shapes (such as flower) are stored in the gallery sg24 (others hidden galleries are sg25 and sg36). (If you delete this sg24 gallery you can't draw the flower from the toolbox anymore.) I tried to copy the gallery to the user gallery folder and rename the filenames, but still it doesn't

Re: [Libreoffice] Purpose of easy task 'Get rid of sal_uLong' ?

2011-03-29 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> Also its really not something only LO does: > > http://www.gtk.org/api/2.6/glib/glib-Basic-Types.html Whoa, stop there. I can assure you that C code written in the "GLib/GTK+ style" definitely does *not* use gint32 or guint32 all over the place, if that was what you were hinting at. gint32

Re: [Libreoffice] need your help to make my first patch. (conditional formattings with unlimited number of rules)

2011-03-29 Thread Chr. Roßmanith
Hi, "git status" tells you, which files were modified, "git commit -m "" -a" puts those modifications under git control and finally "git format-patch HEAD~1" gives you a patch file you can send to the mailing list for review. At least this is the way I create patch files. Make sure that you've

Re: [Libreoffice] Purpose of easy task 'Get rid of sal_uLong' ?

2011-03-29 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Maybe we should use those even in sal/types.h by now? sure, modulo a bit of work to teach windows about standards... as C99 is way to recent of a standard for MS to have implemented it... Poor things, surely no sane person could imagine

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoc] Students and mentors, apply now!

2011-03-29 Thread Skyler Hawthorne
On 03/29/2011 12:18 AM, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: Hi all, this reminder is for both the students and the mentors: please apply now on Google Melange. http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/show/google/gsoc2011/libreoffice * Students applications can be filed from March 28th (yesterday) to April

Re: [Libreoffice] Staroffice module build fail

2011-03-29 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 05:21 +0530, Anurag Jain wrote: > Hello there, > > After ./g pull -r and doing make clean && make build failed for > dbaccess and starmath modules. I referred the wiki and did a prtial > build for dbacess which came out clean. But still I've got build issue > with starmath

Re: [Libreoffice] Purpose of easy task 'Get rid of sal_uLong' ?

2011-03-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Norbert, On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:28:26 -0500 Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > But that argument fall flat when one realized that we have code like > > typedef sal_uIntPtrsal_uLong; /* Replaces type ULONG */ > ... > THAT is confusing and unexpected and already borked with regard to > your valid o

[Libreoffice] Staroffice module build fail

2011-03-29 Thread Anurag Jain
Hello there, After ./g pull -r and doing make clean && make build failed for dbaccess and starmath modules. I referred the wiki and did a prtial build for dbacess which came out clean. But still I've got build issue with starmath module related to some JUnit test. please have a look here http:

Re: [Libreoffice] subsequenttests now run headless

2011-03-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Miklos, lengthy answer to your innocent question ahead -- brace for impact. On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:18:20 +0200 Miklos Vajna wrote: > I'm sure this is a newbie question, but what is the relation between > unit tests, smoketest and subsequenttests? There is a whole lot of terms flying around

[Libreoffice] need your help to make my first patch. (conditional formattings with unlimited number of rules)

2011-03-29 Thread Robert Dargaud
Hi all, I need your help to make my first patch. (conditional formattings with unlimited number of rules). Last week end I've restarted my work on a new clean bootstrap. With these instructions : http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_build Build was ok Before making changes I'

Re: [Libreoffice] Purpose of easy task 'Get rid of sal_uLong' ?

2011-03-29 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi Lubos, > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:11:44 +0200 > Lubos Lunak wrote: > >>  How is that different from having different sal_whatever in the code >> and marshalling with that? > > sal_* Types are typedefs and can be changed as a whole or

Re: [Libreoffice] First-time build fails

2011-03-29 Thread Andy Brown
Joe Hillenbrand wrote: Like I said, "make" works. I tried "make 2>&1 | tee build.log", but "make dev-install" still fails with the name errors. On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andy Brown mailto:a...@the-martin-byrd.net>> wrote: All I know is that not running it caused me problems and running

Re: [Libreoffice] First-time build fails

2011-03-29 Thread Juan Antonio Osorio
I actually also tried to build Libreoffice for the same reazon (trying to get involved with the project through GSoC), but had problems with python. I suppose it works well for python 2.7 but it has problems with python 3.2 (which is the one I have installed). This was the output of autogen.sh ch

Re: [Libreoffice] First-time build fails

2011-03-29 Thread Joe Hillenbrand
Like I said, "make" works. I tried "make 2>&1 | tee build.log", but "make dev-install" still fails with the name errors. On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Andy Brown wrote: > Hi Joe, > > > Joe Hillenbrand wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am trying to build libo from git source for the first time, so th

[Libreoffice] (no subject)

2011-03-29 Thread Brian Carter
Very impressed with the programme (or should I say 'program' ), but, as a newcomer to Linux, I found the installation procedure a pain in the butt. Brian ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailma

Re: [Libreoffice] [tdf-discuss] Re: EasyHack on EasyHacks

2011-03-29 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > > >        I'd also like to hear from some of our new developers that liked that > page - again, on the dev list. > The easy hack page has hugely grown since I started. I guess that is a good thing, but in my opinion it's current form is not

Re: [Libreoffice] First-time build fails

2011-03-29 Thread Andy Brown
Joe Hillenbrand wrote: So you think build1.log is the missing file? Not the log file but the other part. Last weekend I did a clean build and forgot to run that step, the full process is at [1], and got the same error when I tried to do the "make dev-install". I got pointed to [1] when I

Re: [Libreoffice] subsequenttests now run headless

2011-03-29 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:22:43PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > subsequenttests runs headless now by default and seem to be very stable > that way. These tests are very good to parallelize. On my machine I see: Hi, I'm sure this is a newbie question, but what is the relation between unit t

Re: [Libreoffice] [tdf-discuss] Re: EasyHack on EasyHacks

2011-03-29 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 22:51 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi Nuno, First - great work :-) and good to have you helping out here Nuno. Second - this is a page of incredible importance to developers, and as such - any changes to it need to be discussed and decided on the develo

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] removing the executable mode from some source files

2011-03-29 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi there, On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 14:05 -0300, saito wrote: > Here is a list of files that are not supposed to have executable bit > set on Unix/Linux. Great; so I cleaned it up a bit more - the unxlngi6.pro files are build intermediates that are not in git; I removed .bat and .btm files fr

Re: [Libreoffice] First-time build fails

2011-03-29 Thread Andy Brown
Hi Joe, Joe Hillenbrand wrote: Hi all, I am trying to build libo from git source for the first time, so that I can apply to GSoC. I am able to "make" just fine, but when I try to "make dev-install" it fails (please see the errors at the end of the email). Please pardon my ignorance, -Joe Hil

[Libreoffice] subsequenttests now run headless

2011-03-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, subsequenttests runs headless now by default and seem to be very stable that way. These tests are very good to parallelize. On my machine I see: > subsequenttests [ __.oO SCK ] loaded modules: chart2 comphelper configmgr dbaccess editeng forms framework linguistic ooo padmin qadevOOo sal

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [WIP] Remove most of dead code in libs-core

2011-03-29 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi, pushed the framework part. Again a lot of files changed their place so it was quite a lot of work to apply the patch. Additionally I removed lots of dates, comments above removed commented methods, {} not needed anymore after the if () has gone and changed if ( bState = sal_True) to if (

[Libreoffice] HID_SVX_BASIC_MACRO_ORGANIZER

2011-03-29 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Hi, HID_SVX_BASIC_MACRO_ORGANIZER is only #defined in helpid.hrc and listed in help_hid.lst. I think it can be removed?!? Christina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffi

Re: [Libreoffice] Purpose of easy task 'Get rid of sal_uLong' ?

2011-03-29 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Lubos, On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:11:44 +0200 Lubos Lunak wrote: > Why not? I generally just need a number and int fits that perfectly. > I really don't care how many bits it has as long as it works and > don't need to wonder if I should use sal_Int32, sal_UInt16, sal_Int64 > or whatever. For e

[Libreoffice] First-time build fails

2011-03-29 Thread Joe Hillenbrand
Hi all, I am trying to build libo from git source for the first time, so that I can apply to GSoC. I am able to "make" just fine, but when I try to "make dev-install" it fails (please see the errors at the end of the email). Please pardon my ignorance, -Joe Hillenbrand make dev-install log: ~

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] replace Saxon/J XSLT extension functions with libxslt/c++ equivalent

2011-03-29 Thread Peter Jentsch
Am 29.03.11 15:15, schrieb Jan Holesovsky: > Hi Peter, > > On 2011-03-29 at 11:37 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > How wrong I was ;-) - the best is expose the Inflater / Deflater classes > as you did, so I pushed your stuff as it was. :-) > Only did a small follow-up hack, and that was moving them t

Re: [Libreoffice] replace Saxon/J XSLT extension functions with libxslt/c++ equivalent

2011-03-29 Thread Peter Jentsch
Hi Noel, Am 28.03.11 17:46, schrieb Noel Power: > On 26/03/11 13:42, Peter Jentsch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I now have a first working implementation of the XSLT extension >> functions which currently prevent the Office 2003 ML filters from using >> the libxslt based transformation service. >> >> [...].

[Libreoffice] Extending the menu insert - picture with new entries?

2011-03-29 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi all, I installed the extension Creative Commons Licensing into my LibreOffice 3.3.2 and got an extended menu insert - pictures. There were four new entries "From OpenClipart", "From Picasa", "From Flickr", From WikiMedia Commons". I would like to have that extension inside LibreOffice or a

Re: [Libreoffice] Development-/Future-Builds of LibreOffice with special naming posible?

2011-03-29 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi Cor, *, Am Dienstag, 29. März 2011, 19:17:38 schrieb Cor Nouws: > Andreas Mantke wrote (29-03-11 17:40) > > >>This is happening already but only for Mac and Linux. > >> > >>http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ > > > > It would be usefull, if the daily build could be installed

Re: [Libreoffice] Development-/Future-Builds of LibreOffice with special naming posible?

2011-03-29 Thread Cor Nouws
Andreas Mantke wrote (29-03-11 17:40) This is happening already but only for Mac and Linux. http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ It would be usefull, if the daily build could be installed in parallel to the last stable version. That makes it easier for testing and evalu

Re: [Libreoffice] Reverted commit

2011-03-29 Thread Rafael Dominguez
I will do a clean build and see whats the issue On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > I had to revert your commit > > commit a06dbfc4d1252d453b737cde32bad2ecc56e56b1 > Author: Rafael Dominguez > Date: Fri Mar 25 16:58:09 2011 -0430 > >Remove DECLARE_LIST

[Libreoffice] Reverted commit

2011-03-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Rafael, I had to revert your commit commit a06dbfc4d1252d453b737cde32bad2ecc56e56b1 Author: Rafael Dominguez Date: Fri Mar 25 16:58:09 2011 -0430 Remove DECLARE_LIST( SvSlotElementList, SvSlotElement* ) and the subsequent commits to the same area. It was causing a breakage of master

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoc] Students and mentors, apply now!

2011-03-29 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi)
(2011/03/29 14:18), Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: * Mentors need to apply now too in order to be able to participate in the applications selection process after that period. I have applied as a mentor. id = vuhung ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@li

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 35602, which changed state. Bug 35602 Summary: .docx no comments saved https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35602 What|Old Value |New Value ---

Re: [Libreoffice] Development-/Future-Builds of LibreOffice with special naming posible?

2011-03-29 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi Michael, Fridrich, *, Am Dienstag, 29. März 2011, 10:55:53 schrieb Michael Meeks: > Hi Andreas, > > On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 20:39 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote: > > the development of LibreOffice and its features are growing every day > > and week ;-) > > Exciting isn't it :-) > yeah :-)

Re: [Libreoffice] plugin for advanced engineering calculationsand

2011-03-29 Thread Luiz Henrique Natalino
Thank you for your attention. I'm working on a university project, where the goal is to develop solutions for advanced calculations. eg. (integrals, derivatives, polynomials ... etc) a range of funçções. But as I said do not believe it useful to go into details of the source code. I can not scrip

Re: [Libreoffice] plugin for advanced engineering calculationsand

2011-03-29 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Luiz, On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 08:08 -0300, Luiz Henrique Natalino wrote: > I'm having a task to develop a plugin for advanced engineering > calculationsand use this resource in libreoffice, like the lords of > the ropes. Nice ! :-) So - I guess the first question is: does it really need

Re: [Libreoffice] Purpose of easy task 'Get rid of sal_uLong' ?

2011-03-29 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> It's more typing and it's foreign to anybody not used to the codebase. I fully agree with Lubos. Seriously, it is not likely that LO will ever run on a platform where "int" is not at least 32 bits. So using sal_Int32 in cases where a plain int would work just as well is just silly. --tml

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] replace Saxon/J XSLT extension functions with libxslt/c++ equivalent

2011-03-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Peter, On 2011-03-29 at 11:37 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > > > solenv: new PACKAGE2LIB variable defined in libs.mk > > > components/package: made Inflater/Deflater classes (needed by the > > > extension functions) available as DLL imports. > > I think we do not have to expose that, we'll be

Re: [Libreoffice] Purpose of easy task 'Get rid of sal_uLong' ?

2011-03-29 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Monday 28 of March 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi Lubos, > On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:45:11 +0200 > > Lubos Lunak wrote: > > Specifically, the simple and logical type for numbers happens to be > > 'int'. Some kind of intptr type is usually only for ugly hacks, and > > bit-precise types are ma

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#34908

2011-03-29 Thread Noel Power
Hi Lubos On 25/03/11 18:52, Lubos Lunak wrote: printf( "%p %p %s %p %p %s %p %p %s\n", ptr, dynamic_cast< void*>( ptr ), typeid( *ptr ).name(), pFieldmark, dynamic_cast< void*>( pFieldmark ), typeid( *pFieldmark ).name(), pCheckboxFm, dynamic_cast< void*>( pCheckboxFm ), typeid( *pCheckboxFm )

Re: [Libreoffice] GSOC 2011 - Android project - pointers ...

2011-03-29 Thread Jesús Corrius
Hi Michael, all, 2011/3/29 Michael Meeks : > > On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 22:46 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: >> IMO I would like to use 2.2 from the reason you've said and because I >> personally have 2.2 phone ;-) > >        That makes sense then :-) Then again, do we have emulators out there w

[Libreoffice] plugin for advanced engineering calculationsand

2011-03-29 Thread Luiz Henrique Natalino
Hello I'm having a task to develop a plugin for advanced engineering calculationsand use this resource in libreoffice, like the lords of the ropes. 1) What do you interface development Usage? 2) You can place this contribution in libreoffice? 3) where the documentation located? Thanks -- Att.

Re: [Libreoffice] Need a little help with the easyhack "Strip include guards in idl files"

2011-03-29 Thread Nuno J. Silva
Nuno J. Silva writes: > Julien Nabet writes: > >> Then I took a look at the directory "ure/offapi". There are about 3700 >> files and the strip-guards script lets a lot (more than 3000!) of >> "#ifndef" with "#include".( I don't know why, a pb of Unix/Dos >> end-of-line perhaps ?) >> This time it

Re: [Libreoffice] GSOC 2011 - Android project - pointers ...

2011-03-29 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 22:46 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: > IMO I would like to use 2.2 from the reason you've said and because I > personally have 2.2 phone ;-) That makes sense then :-) Then again, do we have emulators out there we can use ? perhaps that is the best approach - the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [WIP] Remove most of dead code in libs-core

2011-03-29 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Pushed avmedia - just to let you know it's going on :-) Christina Am 20.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Xisco Faulí: Here we go with the first round of patches. Whitespaces are not deleted anymore and all the bogus have been deleted. Everything builds allright. Part 1 --> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1274

Re: [Libreoffice] _USE_UNO

2011-03-29 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Removed it, built successfully and pushed it. Christina Am 28.03.2011 14:00, schrieb Michael Meeks: Hi Christina, On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 12:48 +0200, Christina Roßmanith wrote: there are some places where _USE_UNO is #defined and some lines later it is queried via #ifdef. It seems that _USE_U

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] replace Saxon/J XSLT extension functions with libxslt/c++ equivalent

2011-03-29 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Peter, On 2011-03-28 at 16:46 +0100, Noel Power wrote: > > I now have a first working implementation of the XSLT extension > > functions which currently prevent the Office 2003 ML filters from using > > the libxslt based transformation service. Great stuff again! Thank you very much for that

Re: [Libreoffice] Development-/Future-Builds of LibreOffice with special naming posible?

2011-03-29 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Andreas, On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 20:39 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote: > the development of LibreOffice and its features are growing every day > and week ;-) Exciting isn't it :-) > In my opinion it would be a good idea to have a special build (nightly > build or something similar) with a

Re: [Libreoffice] Embedding LibreOffice in SWT on Linux

2011-03-29 Thread bt10000
Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > > Did you test on several platforms / Window managers? I remember having a > grey window with GTK several years ago. > Have tested on Fedora and Ubuntu 32 and 64 bit both running Gnome. According to the bug entry on ooo the issue does not occur on KDE - but I haven't

Re: [Libreoffice] Embedding LibreOffice in SWT on Linux

2011-03-29 Thread bt10000
Hi, Michael Meeks wrote: > > You'll prolly need a build of libreoffice, and a build debug=true of > vcl/ - that might spew some helpful looking warning. Also I'd try to > isolate it to the widget plugin; do: export SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gen vs. > gtk to check that it is not some widget integra

Re: [Libreoffice] when switch to libreoffice-3-3-2 branch, why the g script disappear

2011-03-29 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Is this perhaps on Windows? git has problems replacing files that are in use on Windows, so if a git command attempts to replace the very g script that is being run, it will fail silently, the end result being that g disappears. Just do a git reset --hard HEAD in the bootstrap clone to get it ba

Re: [Libreoffice] Embedding LibreOffice in SWT on Linux

2011-03-29 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hello, First, I apologies for answering that late... but my SWT experience in OpenOffice.org (and thus LibreOffice) is quite old. On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 05:43 -0700, bt1 wrote: > I am using the officebean approach to embed LibreOffice in an SWT > application on Linux. > > I am facing a proble

Re: [Libreoffice] GSoC: Wizards, Java to Python conversion

2011-03-29 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi Xisco, On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 11:16 +0200, Xisco Faulí wrote: > I was wondering if this task is suitable for the GSoC and if there is > anyone who's willing to be a mentor of it. > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Easy_Hacks#Wizards:_Java_to_Python.3F_conversion I could help on the Java sid

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#32413: Add an apply button to style edit dialog in Writer

2011-03-29 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 09:54:56AM +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > Ok, go and push it: it looks OK to me... Just make sure to leave another > easy hack for the position thing ;) Done: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks#Save_position_of_tab_dialogs pgpu9Rxljbxi1.pgp Desc

[Libreoffice] when switch to libreoffice-3-3-2 branch, why the g script disappear

2011-03-29 Thread Samphan Raruenrom
I try the steps explain in http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_build Then I issue a command "./g checkout remotes/origin/libreoffice-3-3-2". I found that now there is no "g" script at the usual place. Have I done something wrong? Or should I keep some files (such as g) from mas

[Libreoffice] [GSoc] Students and mentors, apply now!

2011-03-29 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hi all, this reminder is for both the students and the mentors: please apply now on Google Melange. http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/show/google/gsoc2011/libreoffice * Students applications can be filed from March 28th (yesterday) to April 8th (less than 2 weeks). * Mentors need to apply n

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] replace Saxon/J XSLT extension functions with libxslt/c++ equivalent

2011-03-29 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> Asking here Tor and Fridrich if they are ok with the possibility of > breaking the windows build Well, it has already been broken for several weeks, I doubt it would make the situation much worse. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@li