Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-19 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Júlio, On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:49:57 -0300 Júlio Hoffimann wrote: > The gradual migration is the only way i see to change thousand of > names. Even with regular expressions, the task is not easy to do. There are feature branches. Absolutely no need to do this on master. > Again, painful toda

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-19 Thread Cor Nouws
Júlio Hoffimann wrote (19-04-11 18:12) Btw, LibreOffice was born ~one year ago, "backwards" doesn't make so much sense. The aim was and still is to be the continuation of. So let's be careful with out assets, the users and companies that build on us. Cor -- - http://nl.libreoffice.org -

[Libreoffice] no libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 ?

2011-04-19 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, I wanted to prepare the freebsd port for libreoffice 3.4 beta1, but I can find the distfile for libreoffice-build-3.3.99.1 on the mirrors, it is missing or I missed something and it is not needed anymore? regards, Bapt ___ LibreOffice mailing

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Tinderbox?

2011-04-19 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
One already exists. Maybe it is time to put a link somewhere on the site for new people who want to get in on development to be able to view the dinerbox On 20/04/2011 07:09, Samphan Raruenrom wrote: Firefox - Tinderboxpushlog : http://tbpl.mozilla.org/ Building LibreOffice from master or 3.

[Libreoffice] LibreOffice Tinderbox?

2011-04-19 Thread Samphan Raruenrom
Firefox - Tinderboxpushlog : http://tbpl.mozilla.org/ Building LibreOffice from master or 3.4 branch is hard for beginners because we don't know which point in time that the branch are buildable on one's platform. So I'm wondering whether it is possible to setup Tinderbox for LibreOffice pro

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-19 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, 2011/4/20 Júlio Hoffimann : > The gradual migration is the only way i see to change thousand of names. > Even with regular expressions, the task is not easy to do. Well, easy or hard to do doesn't matter, when the benefit is not so clear to other people. I for example do not see anything th

[Libreoffice] GSoC, help conversion

2011-04-19 Thread Timo
Hi everybody, do you have questions or comments about my project proposal*? This week I am available until Thursday evening (UTC). Kind regards, Timo * http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/timo/1 ___ LibreOffice maili

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #28 from Bob 2011-04-19 16:51:36 PDT --- Added bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36404 More than one text cursor at the same time in textfields in dialog boxes. This bug occur on all dialog boxes who have more than one

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-19 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
The gradual migration is the only way i see to change thousand of names. Even with regular expressions, the task is not easy to do. About the half percentage of Easy Hacks, no matters. We are doing it (in parallel), that is important. Tor was the first to say something really problematic about the

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] conditional formatting with an unlimited number of rules

2011-04-19 Thread Robert Dargaud
Hi Christoph, Le 15/04/11 21:59, Christoph Noack a écrit : Hi Bob, [...] [...] I'm currently thinking about whether something like the "Custom Document Properties" [1] might be a next step - the UI design pattern might fit here as well. Mmh ... Oh ! Yes !!! It seem perfectly adapted, I have a

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fix fdo#36399 - ScrollBar display bug on dialog boxes

2011-04-19 Thread Robert Dargaud
Hi Michael & All, Le 11/04/11 11:41, Michael Meeks a écrit : [...] on 3.4 build, I've a strange display bug on dialog boxes ScrollBar. But finding bugs is good - particularly if we have patches to discuss - do you think you could dig into these ? Last week, my answer was "no". But this evening

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#31251 - Improve default page layout

2011-04-19 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Sébastien, all! Am Dienstag, den 19.04.2011, 08:51 +0200 schrieb Sébastien Le Ray: [... previous mails and topics ...] > > > We've a 4 sided shadow, should I port it Writer as is or are their > > > request of improvment? Should I let the color configuration option > > > for shadow color and us

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild: use gb_CHECKOBJECTOWNER to check for double linked objects

2011-04-19 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Michael, On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:24:57 +0100 Michael Meeks wrote: > Can you unpack 'long strings' for me ? is it noticeably > slower: >5% ? does it print tons of scrolling debug for every module > built ? :-) Long string as in "one string containing a list of every object in the build a

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-19 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Caolán, On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:55:59 +0100 Caolán McNamara wrote: > namespace libreoffice = com::sun::star;, or something of that nature, > in some header probably isn't the worst idea in the world. Though it > does generate a lot of churn to go around changing anything, and the > other langu

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] remove String with OUString

2011-04-19 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 20:31 +0100, Noel Power wrote: > I am sorry it seems I am reverting your revert ( I didn't see > your mail at all, only saw it now from searching the archives because I > didn't see my own mail due some mail client problems :-( ) I committed > this today ( hopefully with the

[Libreoffice] Two services.rdb files in postprocess/packcomponents/makefile.mk ?!

2011-04-19 Thread Hanno Meyer-Thurow
Hi all, would anyone of you know why there are two services.rdb created in that makefile? And in the second one is mailmerge the only component. Could we not simply merge mailmerge into the other one? Why I ask? The way it is now does a bit of a headache for a Python/PyUno disabled build; skipping

Re: [Libreoffice] PyUno is Python 3 compatible

2011-04-19 Thread Hanno Meyer-Thurow
Hi Andreas, your patchset applies fine to 3.3.99.1. Though, configure fails with: checking which python to use... external checking for a Python interpreter with version >= 2.2... none configure: error: no suitable Python interpreter found I test with python3.1 as only version installed. # pytho

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Volker Merschmann changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36285 --- Comment #27 from Volker Me

Re: [Libreoffice] release plan : inconsistency between 3.3.3 and 3.4

2011-04-19 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hello, jumping late into the subject, but On 04/11/2011 12:25 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: The plan is (of course), to keep releasing 3.3.x releases as long as people are interested in creating them I suppose[1] - we should come up May I disagree ?? This is not a very predictable use f

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] remove String with OUString

2011-04-19 Thread Noel Power
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 17:22 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 16:39 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > among others > > Yeah, the catch is that there's a hierarchy of virtual methods in there, > we can't change *some* of the signatures on impls of a specific virtual > method we

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] dbgmacros.hxx / dbgmacros.cxx

2011-04-19 Thread Christina Roßmanith
I've made the changes and pushed them. Christina Am 12.04.2011 11:20, schrieb Noel Power: Hi Christina On 09/04/11 22:08, Christina Roßmanith wrote: [...] So I'll remove the definition of PRE_CONDITION and POST_CONDITION and replace the latter with OSL_POSTCOND (the former isn't used). ENSURE

[Libreoffice] cppcheck inefficient checking for emptiness

2011-04-19 Thread Kayo Hamid
From cppcheck: Using .empty() instead of .size() can be faster. .size() can take linear time but .empty() is guaranteed to take constant time Sending for review. revol_diff --git a/basegfx/source/polygon/b2dpolypolygoncutter.cxx b/basegfx/source/polygon/b2dpolypolygoncutter.cxx

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove String with OUString

2011-04-19 Thread Noel Power
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 13:55 +0100, Xisco Faulí wrote: > Hello, > > It's the first time I do it so I searched for previous commits in > order to get a referent. i couldn't find any example for > String.AssignAscii so I replace it with OUStringBuffer.appendAscii. First sorry for the delay in review

Re: [Libreoffice] Build Failed

2011-04-19 Thread Andreas Becker
Ercole Carpanetto, --with-system-headers did not work for me either and it seems to be an option producing many errors. I think you should try it without that option. Important: Do not forget to remove the unxlng* directories always before running build: > when the problem is isolated and fixed e

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove FileStatusMask_XXX in favour of osl_FileStatus_Mask_XXX

2011-04-19 Thread Christina Roßmanith
Pushed. Christina Am 13.04.2011 22:19, schrieb Christina Roßmanith: Build was fine. I'll push on next Tuesday because there is no time slot for LO earlier. Christina Am 12.04.2011 22:03, schrieb Christina Roßmanith: Am 11.04.2011 23:30, schrieb Michaël Lefèvre: Actually, this was part of t

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-19 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Hi Tor, This is a real problem, but i think it's necessary if we need to grow faster. Every migration or any big change is painful, i'm here now trying to remove Blitz++ dependency in a particular project to use the Boost libraries. Painful today, amazing tomorrow. :-) Regards, Júlio. 2011/4/19

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-marketing] Promoting LibO to Vietnamese students by completing easy hacks

2011-04-19 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi)
Hello Jeff Chimene, (2011/04/19 23:47), Jeff Chimene wrote: Hi Nguyn: I'm sure the only issue is coordinating your selections with whatever is happening with the other LibO GSoC mentors. LibO developers are busy. However, students who join GSOC or MHST will not ping the developers whenever the

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] cppcheck variableScope

2011-04-19 Thread Kayo Hamid
Another path for fixes some cppcheck warnings, sending for review. revol_diff --git a/svl/source/numbers/zformat.cxx b/svl/source/numbers/zformat.cxx index eff1a1c..8252d0c 100644 --- a/svl/source/numbers/zformat.cxx +++ b/svl/source/numbers/zformat.cxx @@ -3548,11 +3548,11 @@ sal_Bool SvNumberfo

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-19 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> The change would be made gradually, the build would not break, namespaces are > just aliases. So one would code as if stuff was in various libreoffice::foo namespaces, but in all compiler and linker error messages, in debugger backtraces in bug reports etc, one would still see the actual com::

Re: [Libreoffice] [libreoffice-marketing] Promoting LibO to Vietnamese students by completing easy hacks

2011-04-19 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi)
Hello Tom Davies, (2011/04/19 8:33), Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) It sounds excellent. Does Google own the list or does it belong to TDF? No :) If Gsoc manage to fix all those then surely you would want a list of new easy hacks? I found this page to help ... http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/

[Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.3.99.2 tag created (3.4.0-beta2)

2011-04-19 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, I have just created the libreoffice-3.3.99.2 tag for 3.4.0-beta2 release. The corresponding official builds will be available by the end of the week. See the attached list of changes against 3.4.0-beta1. You might switch your current 3-4 source tree to it using: ./g fetch --tags ./g checkou

Re: [Libreoffice] Promoting LibO to Vietnamese students by completing easy hacks

2011-04-19 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi)
Hello Cedric Bosdonnat et al, (2011/04/19 14:20), Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: Hello Vu Hung, On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 07:42 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi) wrote: "Mùa hè sáng tạo" (MHST 2010)[1] works much like "(Google) Summer of Code" held among Vietnamese and for Vietnamese students. The reason we

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild: use gb_CHECKOBJECTOWNER to check for double linked objects

2011-04-19 Thread Michael Meeks
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 14:48 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > I have not enabled that in the default build, as it uses some pretty > long strings in GNU make and should not be needed on every build. Can you unpack 'long strings' for me ? is it noticeably slower: >5% ? does it print tons o

Re: [Libreoffice] Cyrillic encoding in Calc

2011-04-19 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 18:51 +0200, Andras Timar wrote: > Hi Kohei, > > 2011/4/19 Kohei Yoshida : > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33100 > > > > but soon realized that I don't have a reproducible case. Judging by the > > bug description all I need to have is the right website page

Re: [Libreoffice] Cyrillic encoding in Calc

2011-04-19 Thread Andras Timar
Hi Kohei, 2011/4/19 Kohei Yoshida : > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33100 > > but soon realized that I don't have a reproducible case.  Judging by the > bug description all I need to have is the right website page to > copy-n-paste some Cyrillic symbols from. > > Could anyone help m

Re: [Libreoffice] First attempt to build LO3.4

2011-04-19 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Kami, On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:33 +0200, KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote: > I recently build a new version from libreoffice-3-4. I found that it > does not not support: > > * patches/dev300 infrastructure to patch the source Right :-) > * download infrastructure for additional stuffs O

[Libreoffice] Cyrillic encoding in Calc

2011-04-19 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi there, So, I decided to take on this bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33100 but soon realized that I don't have a reproducible case. Judging by the bug description all I need to have is the right website page to copy-n-paste some Cyrillic symbols from. Could anyone help me f

Re: [Libreoffice] Mouse with horizontal wheel

2011-04-19 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Tuesday 19 of April 2011, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Anyone who has a special mouse with horizontal wheel willing to take on > this bug? > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36380 > > All my mouses only have vertical wheel, and it's impossible to even > verify this bug, let alone fix thi

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-19 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Hi Joop, The first message in this conversation does exactly what you said. The change would be made gradually, the build would not break, namespaces are just aliases. When the last old name is removed, the header is not useful and should be removed by regexp again. Regards, Júlio. __

[Libreoffice] OSL_ASSERT - remove backtrace or make abort

2011-04-19 Thread Lubos Lunak
Hello, I'd like to remove the backtrace printing from OSL_ASSERT and friends, or, even better and if possible, make these functions work properly, i.e. abort on failure (I'm not really holding my breath on the second one, but refusing that one will at least support the first one). When bui

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-19 Thread Joop Kiefte
As this is an API issue, maybe it's an idea to create a new, cleaner, namespace scheme first and deprecate the old way but not disable it yet... Maybe you could think of finally removing the old namespaces completely in LibreOffice 4 or something like that (a new mayor version is a good moment to b

Re: [Libreoffice] Mouse with horizontal wheel

2011-04-19 Thread Joop Kiefte
If you have a (laptop with) touchpad, usually you can configure this to work. 2011/4/19 Kohei Yoshida : > Anyone who has a special mouse with horizontal wheel willing to take on > this bug? > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36380 > > All my mouses only have vertical wheel, and it's

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-19 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
> > If this is about those com::sun::start::whatever namespaces specifically, > then I think it's part of the UNO interfaces and as such it needs to be > kept > for backwards compatibility for extensions. I think this is a wrong vision, this is why the code is like it is. Maintain backwards comp

[Libreoffice] Mouse with horizontal wheel

2011-04-19 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Anyone who has a special mouse with horizontal wheel willing to take on this bug? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36380 All my mouses only have vertical wheel, and it's impossible to even verify this bug, let alone fix this behavior. Thanks, Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice ha

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Patch for compiling error in component/cui

2011-04-19 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Dimitri Duc wrote: > I got this error in "cui" module > Confirmed - pushed. Thanks for the quick fix! Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpv9tr3j6uhF.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freede

Re: [Libreoffice] Compile failed in postprocess

2011-04-19 Thread Noel Power
On 19/04/11 15:16, Julien Nabet wrote: Hello, Here is the error (even after a rm -rf unxlng*) : > ../unxlngi6/misc/services.input dmake: Error: -- `/home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/solver/300/unxlngi6/xml/component/dbaccess/util/sdbt.component' not found, and can't be made Retrying /h

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-19 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Tuesday 19 of April 2011, Júlio Hoffimann wrote: > Hi Caolán, > > I was thinking in the LibreOffice identity too. Renaming the namespaces > created by sun and other previous versions would help us to understand the > code, but also would make we feel in a new software, a real community > softwar

Re: [Libreoffice] Failed compilation in basctl module

2011-04-19 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Caolan McNamara wrote: > The whole bodge in layout to redefine things is super-ugly and at at > glance I can't see what *exactly* it want's to do, so I didn't bother > trying to fix it, as I can see its a going to be a big old pain in my > ass to see if we should hack ::Window to be just Window to

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-19 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Hi Caolán, I was thinking in the LibreOffice identity too. Renaming the namespaces created by sun and other previous versions would help us to understand the code, but also would make we feel in a new software, a real community software. This is not so hard to do because C++ is powerful as we know

[Libreoffice] Compile failed in postprocess

2011-04-19 Thread Julien Nabet
Hello, Here is the error (even after a rm -rf unxlng*) : > ../unxlngi6/misc/services.input dmake: Error: -- `/home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/solver/300/unxlngi6/xml/component/dbaccess/util/sdbt.component' not found, and can't be made Retrying /home/maryline/compile-libreoffice/libo/po

[Libreoffice] Patch for compiling error in component/cui

2011-04-19 Thread Dimitri Duc
Mac user, I got this error in "cui" module cui/source/options/optaccessibility.src:28:32: error: optaccessibility.hrc: No such file or directory cui/source/options/optasian.src:28:24: error: optasian.hrc: No such file or directory cui/source/tabpages/numpages.src:30:24: error: numpages.hrc: N

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] Remove unused chunk of toolbar menu code

2011-04-19 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Tuesday 19 of April 2011, Christian Dywan wrote: > I stumbled upon a big chunk of code that's commented out in > ToolbarMenu::implPaint not touched since November 2005. Pushed, thanks. -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz ___ LibreOffice mailing list Li

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove unused chunk of toolbar menu code

2011-04-19 Thread Christian Dywan
I stumbled upon a big chunk of code that's commented out in ToolbarMenu::implPaint not touched since November 2005. ciao, ChristianFrom 39b3296fadc53c740c53145f8562eef9d246c1b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Dywan Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:27:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused

Re: [Libreoffice] If you got bounce notification, all is fine again

2011-04-19 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Korrawit, On 2011-04-19 at 14:32 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: > So, should we have (or we already have?) some malware filter in the > mailing list? or banning these users? or just ignore them? We ban spammers from time to time manually; the ideal solution would mean updates in the free

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] should fix bugs fdo#36080 and fdo#34666

2011-04-19 Thread Anthony Durity
Hello good people, If someone related to this area could give this patch the once over. Please find attached patch. This is (teensy tiny) patch that should fix an annoying HTML filter "feature". The problem is is that an xhtml style close tag is not recognized is a html tag which is as it shoul

Re: [Libreoffice] When can we import xml data

2011-04-19 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Fernand, On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 10:29 +0200, Fernand Vanrie wrote: > I am just a humble advanced user, The extentsion from StarXpert is a > scrumbled jar file. :-) with no source code ? if so, hard to deal with. > Its not the Extension who is faulty, its simple a lack of XML > import

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Only accelerators in Edit popup on Windows and KDE

2011-04-19 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Tuesday 19 of April 2011, Christian Dywan wrote: > > Am 19.04.2011 13:35:54 schrieb Lubos Lunak: > > I think it makes more sense to have it as a style setting rather than > > hardcoding a bunch of if's > > I don't think it makes sense as a setting, and no platform has a setting > for this afair.

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36277, which changed state. Bug 36277 Summary: desktop-integration package use wrong version (3.3 instead of 3.4) - productversion.mk not updated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36277 What|Ol

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Only accelerators in Edit popup on Windows and KDE

2011-04-19 Thread Christian Dywan
Am 19.04.2011 13:30:25 schrieb libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org: > On 2011-04-15 at 12:48 +, Christian Dywan wrote: > > I'm not sure if this is the best way to address this, I looked at the > > style settings, but this isn't a setting, and I saw get_desktop_session() > but that isn't pub

Re: [Libreoffice] looking for functions in calc

2011-04-19 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 08:16 -0300, Luiz Henrique Natalino wrote: > Hello, > > Someone can tell me where I can find the source codes calc sc/source > , math functions starmath/source C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org h

Re: [Libreoffice] looking for functions in calc

2011-04-19 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Luiz, On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 08:16 -0300, Luiz Henrique Natalino wrote: > Someone can tell me where I can find the source codes calc, math > functions, which inthis file? Certainly ! :-) they are in two places: sc/source/core/tool/interpr3.cxx and friends ( lots

[Libreoffice] looking for functions in calc

2011-04-19 Thread Luiz Henrique Natalino
Hello, Someone can tell me where I can find the source codes calc, math functions, which inthis file? Thanks -- Att. Luiz Henrique Natalino ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/li

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36345, which changed state. Bug 36345 Summary: Checkboxes missing from Options panel https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36345 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36284, which changed state. Bug 36284 Summary: FILESAFE impossible, General Error saving a document https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36284 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PATH] prefer prefix ++/-- operators

2011-04-19 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 15:36 -0300, Kayo Hamid wrote: > Continuing the journey of cleaning cppcheck. Looks good to me anyway, pushed, thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36271, which changed state. Bug 36271 Summary: FILEOPEN impossible, General error, memory could not be read https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36271 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [PUSHED] [PATCHES] Fixed some CLang++ errors/warnings in sal

2011-04-19 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 23:48 -0700, Julien Chaffraix wrote: > I just went ahead and fixed the root cause of the bug instead of using > an assertion. While at it, I fixed another error in the same file. Looks good to me anyway, pushed, thanks for this. C. __

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCHES] Fixed some CLang++ errors/warnings in sal

2011-04-19 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 08:51 -0700, Julien Chaffraix wrote: > > Applied - would you want to look into the TODO case as well? A rather > > nasty cause for errors ... > > While it is theoretically possible to hit this, I doubt in practice > that writing an int to a file descriptor will ever do a part

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 36263, which changed state. Bug 36263 Summary: No icons in user interface https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36263 What|Old Value |New Value

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposing a new Easy Hack - project consistent namespaces

2011-04-19 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 18:27 -0300, Júlio Hoffimann wrote: > Hi devs, > > > How hard is to rename all the C++ namespaces to most comprehensive and > consistent names with the project? Well, one fairly common pattern is sprinkled around of... namespace css = com::sun::star; namespace cssu = com::

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Re: [Patches] Fix build with --enable-werror under CLang++

2011-04-19 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 14:42 -0700, Julien Chaffraix wrote: > Hi, > > attached are 2 trivial patches to make the 'tools' directory build > with --enable-werror under CLang++. One of the change is actually an > existing off-by-one error caught by the compiler. Excellent, thanks for these. Pushed no

Re: [Libreoffice] Help on fixing set_soenv so that it uses configure --build options

2011-04-19 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 20:57 -0400, Pablo Duboue wrote: > Moreover, it makes it impossible to build in a 32-bit chroot running in a > x86-64 machine. Well, a) you can run linux32 before running configure, that's sort of my typical route b) for the other multilibs platforms, powerpc64 and s390x, w

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OSX daily build from 17-04-2011 crashes on start

2011-04-19 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 19/04/11 10:27, Caolán McNamara a écrit : > > ImplFontCharMap::DeReference -> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36336 > > fixed yesterday 2011-04-18 > Great stuff !! Thanks. Alex ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.fre

Re: [Libreoffice] Mac OSX daily build from 17-04-2011 crashes on start

2011-04-19 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:15 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Hi all, > > Am testing 3.4 daily builds on Mac OSX, the latest available one from > 17-04-2011 crashes on startup. Attached is the Apple trace crashrep. ImplFontCharMap::DeReference -> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3633

[Libreoffice] Mac OSX daily build from 17-04-2011 crashes on start

2011-04-19 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Hi all, Am testing 3.4 daily builds on Mac OSX, the latest available one from 17-04-2011 crashes on startup. Attached is the Apple trace crashrep. Alex Process: soffice [29374] Path:/Applications/LibreOffice.app/Contents/MacOS/soffice Identifier: org.libreoffice.script V

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] po2oo --skipsource support

2011-04-19 Thread KAMI911 KAMI911
Hi Andras, I tried to use internal toolkit: " checking which translate-toolkit to use... internal " But when I try to build translations I got this error: " = Building module translations = Entering /home/kami/git/libreoffice-3-4/bootstrap/translations : && LD_LIBRARY_PATH

Re: [Libreoffice] If you got bounce notification, all is fine again

2011-04-19 Thread Korrawit Pruegsanusak
Hello First of all, thanks for fixing. I think this bounce is because of the Mydoom-attached email: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-April/010608.html So, should we have (or we already have?) some malware filter in the mailing list? or banning these users? or just ignore them?

Re: [Libreoffice] Promoting LibO to Vietnamese students by completing easy hacks

2011-04-19 Thread Cedric Bosdonnat
Hello Vu Hung, On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 07:42 +0700, Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi) wrote: > "Mùa hè sáng tạo" (MHST 2010)[1] works much like > "(Google) Summer of Code" held among Vietnamese and for Vietnamese > students. > > The reason we have our own version of Gsoc in Vietnam is that > students' English

Re: [Libreoffice] Build Failed

2011-04-19 Thread Andreas Becker
It seems like the header files are corrupt. Reinstall glibc. Please show your build options (your arguments passed to autogen.sh) and run "build --verbose" on the module. --Andreas Becker 2011/4/19 Ercole Carpanetto > On 19 April 2011 04:29, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 20:1

[Libreoffice] The Document Foundation is open for members

2011-04-19 Thread Andre Schnabel
Dear contributors, within the last months the community around LibreOffice and The Document Foundation worked hard to establish policies, processes, infrastructure and all the things you need to deliver a high quality software. One of our basic principles is that we will acknowledge this merit